February 17-18, 1994
02-17-1994
Pages 54-127
BOARD OF REGENTS
UNIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEVADA
February 17-18, 1994
The Board of Regents met on February 17-18, 1994 in Rooms 201-202
Moyer Student Union, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Members present: Dr. James Eardley, Chairman
Mrs. Shelley Berkley
Dr. Jill Derby
Mr. Joseph M. Foley
Mrs. Dorothy S. Gallagher
Mr. Madison Graves, II
Dr. Lonnie Hammargren
Mr. Daniel J. Klaich
Mrs. Carolyn M. Sparks
Mrs. June F. Whitley
Members absent: Mrs. Nancy Price
Others present: Interim Chancellor John Richardson
President Anthony Calabro, WNCC
President Joseph Crowley, UNR
President John Gwaltney, TMCC
President Robert Maxson, UNLV
President Paul Meacham, CCSN
President Ronald Remington, NNCC
President James Taranik, DRI
Mr. Donald Klasic, General Counsel
Mr. Ron Sparks, Vice Chancellor
Mrs. Karen Steinberg, Interim Vice Chancellor
Ms. Mary Lou Moser, Secretary
Also present were Faculty Senate Chairmen Alan Balboni (CCSN),
Phil Boardman (UNR), Chris Gaub (Unit), Scott Hawkins (NNCC),
Dan Mc Clure (TMCC), Alan Mc Kay (DRI), Mark Melrose (WNCC),
and John Swetnam (UNLV), and Student Association Officers.
Chairman Eardley called the meeting to order at 11:06 A.M. Thurs-
day, February 17, 1994, with all Regents present except Regents
Berkley and Price.
1. Approved 1994 Regents' Award for Creative Activities
Approved the 1994 Regents' Award for Creative Activities
for the following co-nominees:
Jerry L. Crawford, Ph. D.
Professor of Theatre Arts
College of Fine & Performing Arts
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Hart L. Wegner, Ph. D.
Professor of German, Comparative Literature, and
Film Studies
College of Liberal Arts
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
These recipients will be honored at ceremonies in conjunc-
tion with Commencement in May.
Mrs. Berkley entered the meeting.
Chairman of the Research Affairs Council Dr. Kenneth Hunter
distributed background information on each of the recipients
which is filed in the Regents' Office. He informed the
Board of Regents of their accomplishments.
Dr. Jerry Crawford became affiliated with the University
System in 1962. He is presently Professor of Theatre Arts,
Dramaturge, Playwright in Residence, and Head of the Master
of Fine Arts Play Writing Program at UNLV. He has been
recognized nationally for his creative activities, which
include authorship of 17 original plays and direction of
over 30 productions. In 1991, he was inducted into the
College of Fellows of the American Theatre, the most pres-
tigious award an educator/artist can receive in the Theatre
Arts. He was the recipient of the John F. Kennedy Center
Gold Medallion of Excellence in 1977 and 1980, the only
person in the United States to receive the award twice. Dr.
Crawford is author of "Acting in Person and in Style", the
most widely used textbook on acting in the United States,
Canada, and England. UNLV has recognized him with an Alumni
Outstanding Faculty Award in 1978, and a Barrick Distin-
guished Scholar Award in 1982. Dr. Crawford's creative
activities have brought great distinction to himself and
the UCCSN over his long career.
Dr. Hunter read a nomination letter, regarding Dr. Hart
Wegner, from Dr. Richard Wiley, Department of English at
UNLV. The following comments have been excerpted from this
letter. Dr. Hart Wegner is a native of Silesia, a graduate
of Harvard, and Professor of German, Comparative Literature,
and Film Studies at UNLV. He writes stories that capture
the human spirit in a European world that can no longer be
found on our maps, and exists in the memories of only a few.
From the worlds of his predecessors Dr. Wegner has created
something new with the stories he has written. He has
received national notoriety for his writing, as evidenced
by inclusion of one short story in Best American Short Sto-
ries (1965), and as recipient of the Pushcart Prize (1984/
85). His work has been recognized with the Charles Vanda
Prize for Excellence in the Arts at UNLV in 1989, and with
membership in the Nevada Writers Hall of Fame last year.
Dr. Wegner's creative activities have brought great distinc-
tion to himself and the UCCSN.
Mrs. Sparks moved approval of the co-nominees of the 1994
Regents' Award for Creative Activities. Mrs. Gallagher
seconded.
Mr. Klaich questioned how the monetary stipend would be
distributed, and Dr. Hunter responded that it would be
split between the two recipients.
Motion carried.
2. Approved Regents' Researcher Award
Approved the 1994 Regents' Researcher Award for the follow-
ing nominee:
Kenton Morris Sanders, Ph. D.
Professor and Chairman
Department of Physiology
University of Nevada School of Medicine
Dr. Sanders will be honored at ceremonies in conjunction
with Commencement in May.
Chairman of the Research Affairs Council Dr. Kenneth Hunter
distributed background information on Dr. Sanders, filed
in the Regents' Office, and he informed the Board of Regents
of his accomplishments.
Dr. Sanders joined the Department of Physiology in 1982, and
has been Professor and Chairman of the Department since
1986. During his tenure, the Department of Physiology has
emerged as one of the preeminent research Departments in the
University. While Dr. Sanders' nomination is based princi-
pally on his extraordinary research achievements, it is im-
portant to note that he has been consistently judged an
excellent teacher of graduate students, medical students,
and postdoctoral fellows. His scholarship and teaching have
been recognized with UNR's Outstanding Researcher Award in
1991, and he was awarded a Foundation Professorship in 1993.
He has published more than 100 peer-reviewed papers in the
area of smooth muscle biology, particularly the physiology
of gastrointestinal smooth muscle. Two of his most recent
research contributions have been published in the presti-
gious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and
the findings are being widely quoted by scientists in the
field. His research accomplishments and those of the ex-
cellent group of physiologists he has gathered together has
made the University of Nevada School of Medicine one of the
top centers in the world for smooth muscle research.
Five years ago, Dr. Sanders served as the principal investi-
gator on a $7 million Program Project Grant from the Nation-
al Institutes of Health, the largest competitive research
grant in Nevada history. This has contributed to the devel-
opment of some of the finest, best equipped physiology re-
search laboratories in the world, laboratories that attract
top-notch students, postdoctoral fellows, and visiting sci-
entists. His past work has brought great credit to himself
and the UCCSN.
Mrs. Gallagher moved approval of the nominee for the 1994
Regents' Researcher Award. Mrs. Sparks seconded. Motion
carried.
3. Information Only: Outstanding Student Recognition
At the request of the Board of Regents, each Student Govern-
ment Officer reported on the outstanding student achievement
for the institution. Ref. C is filed in the Regents' Of-
fice.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
John Stuart
David M. Anderson
Rajkumar Rajogopalan
Robert Paxton
Jim Preddy
David Turner
Mrs. Whitley left the meeting.
Truckee Meadows Community College
Rosemary Dixon
Danielle Nina Harris
ASTM President Don Isler introduced Dennis Moore, ASTM
Officer, who was in attendance.
4. Information Only: Outstanding Faculty Recognition
At the request of the Board of Regents, each Faculty Senate
Chairman reported on the outstanding faculty achievement for
the institution. Ref. B is filed in the Regents' Office.
University of Nevada, Reno
Marsha H. Read
Community College of Southern Nevada
Thomas Ferguson
Western Nevada Community College
Doris Dawn Dwyer
5. Introductions
President Crowley introduced GSA President Samantha Hudson,
who served as ASUN President at UNR in 1992.
Mr. Klaich announced that President Crowley had recently
become a grandfather for the third time, and congratulated
both President Crowley and daughter Margaret.
6. Chairman's Report
Chairman Eardley stated that he appreciated working with
the Board members, and has considered their advice and
counsel in making decisions for the work of the Board of
Regents.
7. Chancellor's Report
Interim Chancellor Richardson reported that staff is in the
process of preparing a summary on the group reports derived
from the Regents' Workshop, which was held January 24-25,
1994. The staff will make a report at the next Board meet-
ing.
Dr. Richardson reported that the Tuition Committee is devel-
oping recommendations and has reviewed comparative national
and western states' data for public institutions. The
Committee has made several decisions concerning tuition and
fees that affect the following:
1) Differential Tuition - The number of programs which the
Board endorses for grants and waivers or reduced tuition
has been reviewed by Interim Vice Chancellor Karen
Steinberg. The Committee felt that the Board needs to
review these programs and analyze the impact on finan-
cial aid.
2) Non-Resident Tuition - The Committee recommends an in-
crease in non-resident tuition for the 1st year ($4900
for Universities; $3100 for Community Colleges), and
the 2nd year of the biennium ($5100 for Universities;
$3200 for Community Colleges). This is approximately
a 3.4% increase.
3) Registration Fees - The Committee recommends leaving
the registration fees for the coming biennium at the
same level as 1994-95. The Committee voted 5-4 on this
issue, and it was the sense of the Committee that the
minority opinion be explained to the Board for its
consideration at the next meeting.
Hearings are being scheduled for both north and south, at
UNR and UNLV, to receive input from the students before
making the final report to the Board at its next meeting.
The University Press continues to receive national recog-
nition for its work, and does a wonderful job bringing
recognition to the State of Nevada and the System.
1) Two winners in the 1994 AAUP Book, Jacket & Journal Show
Competition: "Trappings of the Great Basin Buckaroo" by
Hadley has been selected as a winning illustrated book;
and "Solitude" by Uzra is a winning jacket. From a
field of 305 books, 312 jackets and 12 journal entries,
the judges selected 36 books, 30 jackets and 5 journals
to comprise this year's show.
2) The "Minneapolis Star Tribune" selected "Torn by Light"
and "Desert Wood" as two of the best books of poetry
reviewed in the "Star Tribune" during 1993.
Dr. Richardson announced, with much regret, that the Aca-
demic Affairs Office has received the resignation of its
secretary Rene Hange. Her husband will be taking a position
in Greeley, Colorado, their home town, and her last day in
the office is February 23, 1994. She will be greatly
missed.
Mrs. Gallagher suggested that the Chairman of the Board
express, on behalf of the Board, its appreciation to the
University Press. The Board is very proud and confident of
the work that is generated from the Press.
8. Approved Emeritus Status
Approved the following recommendations to Emeritus Status:
A. University of Nevada, Reno - Emeritus status has been
recommended for the following UNR faculty, effective
July 1, 1994:
Nazir A. Ansari, Professor of Management, Emeritus
Allen H. Brady, Professor of Computer Science, Emeritus
J. Wayne Burkhardt, Associate Professor of Range
Science, Emeritus
William O. Champney, Associate Professor of Agricultural
Economics, Emeritus
Robert D. Harvey, Ph. D., Associate Professor of
English, Emeritus
William H. Jacobsen, Ph. D., Professor of English,
Emeritus
Keith Loper, Associate Professor of Recreation, Physical
Education and Dance, Emeritus
Ronald A. Macauley, Ph. D., Professor of Mathematics,
Emeritus
Mark Magney, Associate Professor of Recreation,
Physical Education and Dance, Emeritus
Robert B. Mc Kee, Professor of Mechanical Engineering,
Emeritus
Alvin E. Miller, Area Extension Livestock Specialist,
Emeritus
Michael B. Mooney, State Extension Specialist, Emeritus
Gail G. Munk, Extension Educator, Emeritus
Ira Pauly, M. D., Professor of Psychiatry & Behavorial
Sciences, Emeritus
Fred "Pete" Perriera, Student Life, Emeritus
Keith A. Pierce, Professor of Counseling and Educational
Psychology, Emeritus
Merle E. (Ted) Puffer, Professor of Music, Emeritus
Lawrence K. Schneider, Ph. D., Professor of Anatomy,
Emeritus
Diana F. Thran, Assistant Professor of Soil Science,
Emeritus
F. Donald Tibbitts, Ph. D., Professor of Anatomy,
Emeritus
George Twardokens, Professor of Physical Education,
Emeritus
Lyle Warner, Ph. D., Associate Professor of Sociology,
Emeritus
B. University of Nevada, Las Vegas - Emeritus status has
been recommended for Dr. Anne Wyman, Emeritus Professor
of Geology, upon her retirement on June 30, 1994.
C. Truckee Meadows Community College - Emeritus status has
been recommended for Kenneth E. Johnson, Director of
Admissions and Records, effective upon his retirement
on September 30, 1993.
Mr. Klaich moved approval of the Emeritus Status at UNR,
UNLV and TMCC. Dr. Derby seconded. Motion carried.
9. Approved Consent Agenda
Approved the Consent Agenda (identified as Ref. A, filed
with the permanent minutes), containing the following:
(1) Approved the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 6, 1994 and the special meeting held January
21, 1994.
(2) Approved the gifts, grants and contracts, listed in
Ref. C-1, filed with the permanent minutes.
(3) Information Only: The titles of Associate Deans at
WNCC have been changed to Dean. The title change
applied to the following individuals:
Dane Apalategui, Dean of Finance
Jerry Barbee, Dean of Applied Sciences & Technology
Joe De Flyer, Dean of Arts & Sciences
Nick Paul, Dean of Student Services
Bus Scharmann, Dean of Off-Campus Programs
This is a title change only. There is no change in
salary or job description.
(4) Approved an extension of sick leave for Dr. Beth
Mehocic, Department of Dance Arts at UNLV, through
the Spring 1994 semester, ending May 17, 1994.
(5) Approved a waiver for early retirement for Dr. Jerome
Vallen, Professor of Hotel Management at UNLV. Dr.
Vallen was on a one-semester leave without pay during
the past year and would like the early retirement in-
centive to be based on a full year's salary rather
than the one semester, in accordance with Board of
Regents' Handbook, Title 4, Chapter 3.
(6) Approved to grant extended leave for the Spring
semester for Thymios Carabas, Professor of English
at CCSN, due to family illness.
(7) Approved tenure on hire for Dr. Romesh C. Batra,
Professor of Mechanical Engineering, College of
Engineering. Dr. Batra has been selected as the
Chair of the Department of Mechanical Engineering
at UNR.
(8) Approved additions to the UNLV Bylaws, as contained
in Ref. C-2, filed in the Regents' Office.
(9) Approved the following Community College Summer
Session Budgets for 1994:
CCSN
Summer School
1993 1994
Projected Budgeted
Actual Estimate
Resources:
Opening Account Balance $144,047 $247,637
Revenue:
Registration Fees 435,297 600,000
Total Source of Funds $597,344 $847,637
Expenditures:
Professional Contracts $339,562 $495,000
Classified Salaries 0 15,200
Wages 0 4,500
Fringe Benefits 7,519 14,280
Operating 4,380 4,500
Out-of-State Travel 125 4,500
Total Expenditures $351,586 $534,480
Balance $227,758 $313,157
Transfers In 29,879 10,000
Transfers Out - 10,000 -120,000
Ending Balance $247,637 $203,157
TMCC
Summer School
1993 1994
Projected Budgeted
Actual Estimate
Resources:
Opening Account Balance $ 41,775 $ 57,540
Revenue:
Registration Fees 190,726 219,335
Total Source of Funds $232,501 $276,875
Expenditures:
Professional Salaries $138,516 $176,042
Fringe Benefits 9,074 10,455
Classified Salaries 3,935 19,861
Fringe Benefits 354 3,333
Wages 170 800
Fringe Benefits 13 59
Operating 22,899 37,156
Total Expenditures $174,961 $247,706
Ending Account Balance 57,540 29,169
Total Use of Funds $232,501 $276,875
WNCC
Summer School
1993 1994
Projected Budgeted
Actual Estimate
Resources:
Opening Account Balance $ 52,579 $ 64,789
Revenue:
Tuition 101,940 112,134
Total Source of Funds $154,519 $176,923
Expenditures:
Professional Salaries $ 75,445 $ 82,990
Fringe Benefits 4,149 4,569
Classified Salaries 5,035 5,539
Fringe Benefits 1,373 1,510
Wages 1,609 1,770
Fringe Benefits 142 156
Travel 236 260
Operating 1,741 1,915
Total Expenditures $ 89,730 $ 98,704
Ending Account Balance 64,789 78,219
Total Use of Funds $154,519 $176,923
(10) Approved allocation of grants-in-aid for 1994-95. NRS
396.540 provides for tuition waivers for "students
from other states and foreign countries, not to exceed
a number equal to 3% of the total matriculated enroll-
ment of students for past preceding Fall semester".
Board policy provides for similar grants-in-aid for
the same number of students for the payment of in-
state registration fees.
Based on enrollment figures for Fall 1993, the Offi-
cers request the following allocation of grants-in-aid
for Fall 1994-95:
In-State Out-of-State
UNR
Athletics 100 100
Music 40 25
*Music 20 20
Foreign 0 15
Other (General) 188 188
Total 348 348
Native Americans 20 20
*On March 28, 1980 the Board of Regents approved
for the Marching Band a separate budget alloca-
tion that had the effect of granting it the
equivalent of 20 additional in-state and 20
additional out-of-state grants-in-aid.
UNLV
Athletics 108 108
Music 54 54
Other 379 379
Total 541 541
*Native Americans 50 10
*The allocation for Native American grants-in-aid
is not included in the 3% maximum and represents
a separate allocation.
CCSN
Regents 172
Native American 1
Total 173
NNCC
Regents 83
Native Americans 5
Total 88
TMCC
Regents 271
Native Americans 12
Total 283
WNCC
Regents 143
Native Americans 30
Total 173
(11) Approved authorization to utilize Capital Improvement
Fees in the amount of $130,700 for the following proj-
ects at TMCC:
Bulletin Boards for Phase V Building $ 1,200
Automatic Faucets for Phase II & III
ADA requirement 3,500
Safety improvement for Atrium guard railing 5,000
Curtains for Phase V Multi-purpose room 7,500
Alarm system for General Computer Access
Lab entrance area, Phase V 8,500
ADA improvements:
Toilet room modifications 45,000
Signage, interior and exterior 60,000
(12) Approved the following interlocal agreements:
A. UCCSN Board of Regents/Medical School and the
University Medical Center of Southern Nevada
(Affiliation Agreement)
Effective Date: Date approved by Board through
June 30, 1994
Amount : $49,489 to Medical School
Purpose : Amendment to original agreement
to reflect Hospital's contribu-
tion for two orthopaedic resi-
dents' salaries.
B. UCCSN Board of Regents/UNLV and the Las Vegas
Valley Water District (Easement)
Effective Date: Date approved by Board
Amount : $1 to UNLV
Purpose : Easement and right-of-way for
construction, operation, mainte-
nance, repair, renewal, recon-
struction and removal of pipe-
lines for conducting water with
the right of ingress and egress
at corner of Tropicana Avenue and
Swenson Street.
C. UCCSN Board of Regents/UNLV and Department of
Human Resources/Division of Child and Family
Services (Interlocal Contract)
Effective Date: October 1, 1993 through
September 30, 1994
Amount : $5544 to UNLV
Purpose : UNLV to monitor adjustment and
adaptation of adolescents former-
ly in foster care to independence
and community life.
D. UCCSN Board of Regents/WNCC and Department of
Motor Vehicles and Public Safety/Office of Traffic
Safety (Interlocal Contract)
Effective Date: Date approved by Board through
June 30, 1994
Amount : $12,000 to WNCC
Purpose : WNCC to conduct motorcycle safety
and education course using cur-
rent edition of Motorcycle Safety
Foundation's Motorcycle Rider
Course.
E. UCCSN Board of Regents/CCSN and Nevada Power
Company (Easement)
Effective Date: Date approved by Board
Amount : $1 to CCSN
Purpose : Right to construct, operate, add
to, maintain and remove under-
ground electric system(s) con-
sisting of duct lines, manholes,
vaults, wires, cables, transform-
er installation, service boxes
and other fixtures and apparatus
for the transmission and distri-
bution of electricity on parcel
of land on CCSN's Cheyenne Cam-
pus.
F. UCCSN Board of Regents/CCSN and Sprint/Central
Telephone-Nevada (Right of Way)
Effective Date: Date approved by Board
Amount : $1 to CCSN
Purpose : Perpetual right to construct,
operate, add to, maintain, re-
move above ground switching
device and other fixtures and
apparatus for telephone and/or
other communication circuits on
parcel of land on Gowan next to
Rio Robles Villas, on CCSN prop-
erty.
Mrs. Gallagher move adoption of the Consent Agenda and
approval of the prepared agenda with the authority to
change the order of the items as specified throughout the
meeting. Mr. Klaich seconded.
Mr. Klaich questioned if all the Native American grants-in-
aid allocations are utilized, as reported in item 10 of the
Consent Agenda, and requested each President to submit a
reply in writing. President Crowley replied that UNR uti-
lizes all in-State Native American grants-in-aid.
Dr. Derby questioned the ending fund balance of the Summer
Session budgets, as reported in item 9 of the Consent Agenda
and President Calabro responded that the ending fund balance
is forwarded to the next Summer Session for start-up costs.
It is not a reflection of the programs having too much money
at the end of the year.
Motion carried.
Mrs. Whitley returned to the meeting.
10. Closed Session
Upon motion by Mr. Klaich, seconded by Mr. Graves, the Board
moved to a closed session for the discussion of the charac-
ter, alleged misconduct, professional competence, or physi-
cal or mental health of an employee(s) of the UCCSN or other
person(s) in accordance with NRS 241.030.
The open meeting recessed at 11:50 A.M. and reconvened in closed
session at 1:00 P.M. with all Regents present except Regents
Foley, Hammargren and Price. The open meeting reconvened at
2:21 P.M. Thursday, February 17, 1994, with all Regents present
except Regents Berkley, Hammargren, Price and Whitley.
11. Information Only: Public Comment
No public comment was made.
Mrs. Berkley entered the meeting.
UCCSN Public Information Officer Pamela Galloway introduced
Debra Bass, Las Vegas Sun reporter, and Natalie Patton, Review
Journal reporter. She announced that Las Vegas Sun reporter,
Eric Pappa, has accepted another reporting position.
12. Approved Campus Academic Master Plans
The Board of Regents' planning process calls for review of
Campus Academic Master Plans in Spring 1994, prior to the
submission of the System 1995-97 budget request (the next
scheduled review by the Board will be Spring 1996). Each
Campus has reviewed and revised its master plan approved
by the Board with one exception in 1993. Campuses have
also prepared reports on the progress made toward imple-
menting these plans.
Interim Vice Chancellor Steinberg provided an overview of
implementation progress and discussed the System Office
review and overview of the revised plans as contained in
Refs. D, E, F, which are filed in the Regents' Office,
Administration Office (North and South).
Interim Chancellor Richardson and Interim Vice Chancellor
Steinberg recommended approval of these Academic Master
Plans with the exception of the plan submitted by TMCC.
There were no changes submitted by TMCC from its last
approved Academic Master Plan. Mrs. Steinberg stated that
there were no major concerns, but some issues should be
addressed prior to the next legislative session. She re-
quested that time be allowed for TMCC to make some refine-
ments to their Academic Master Plan.
Mr. Graves left the meeting during this discussion.
Mrs. Gallagher moved approval of the Academic Master Plans
submitted by the institutions, with the exception of TMCC.
Dr. Derby seconded.
Mr. Klaich stated that he appreciated UNR's focus and
attention to teaching skills.
Dr. Derby stated that UCCSN has come a long way in just a
few years by integrating the strategic directions and the
Campus master plans. A number of the institutions have
struggled with priorities in light of the budget reductions.
She stated that all programs are important and have value;
however, it is a tough process to review all programs, and
she applauded the institutions for their hard work.
Mr. Graves returned to the meeting.
Motion carried.
Mr. Foley pointed out that throughout the reports the theme
"due to current fiscal constraints" was noted. He has been
made aware that there is $6 billion in gaming revenue that
has been received by the State. He suggested that UCCSN
approach the Interim Finance Committee to see if funding
could be allocated to the System before the slated prison
is built in Lovelock. UCCSN does not have the opportunity
to utilize the trigger method anymore, so he questioned how
UCCSN should proceed. He felt that UCCSN should try to
obtain funding.
Mrs. Steinberg stated that she appreciated the efforts on
making these Academic Master Plans a reality. There has
been a lot of hard work performed by faculty and staff.
She thanked the institutions for their leadership and
efforts.
Mrs. Gallagher also extended her appreciation for the
seriousness in addressing the Academic Master Plans in a
very short time and with reduced funding. She thanked Mrs.
Steinberg and staff for working diligently on this project.
These plans will help UCCSN get through these tough times.
Chairman Eardley announced that he had cancelled the closed
session that was scheduled for this evening.
13. Approved Handbook Addition, Guideline for Academic Master
Planning Documents
When the Campus Academic Master Plans were approved in 1993,
the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, Campus representa-
tives, and Board members discussed revising the Handbook
language to include more details for the guidelines for the
planning documents. Dialogue regarding this issue has con-
tinued with the Academic Affairs Council and the Council of
Presidents. The Handbook changes for Title 4, Chapter 14,
Section 2, Time Frames for Preparation of Academic Master
Planning Documents, contained in Ref. G, filed in the Re-
gents' Office, reflect the suggestions made by Board mem-
bers and the Vice Chancellor.
These Handbook changes have been reviewed by the Academic
Affairs Council and by the Presidents.
Mr. Klaich left the meeting.
Interim Chancellor Richardson stated that small group
meetings were held north and south to discuss how Academic
Master Plans could be improved, and how comprehensive state-
ments could be improved regarding the mission statements.
Dr. Derby moved approval of the Handbook addition regarding
Guidelines for Academic Master Planning Documents. Mrs.
Berkley seconded. Motion carried.
14. Approved Handbook Changes, Academic and Administrative
Faculty Salary Schedule, UNR and UNLV
Approved the salary schedules for academic and administra-
tive faculty at UNR and UNLV, as contained in Handbook Title
4, Chapter 3, Section 20, which have been updated. The mid-
points of these schedules reflect the average salaries paid
to faculty in comparable positions at the peer institutions
(the 49 principal land grant institutions). The last time
these schedules were updated is 1991/92. Since that time
faculty salaries around the country have steadily increased.
The new schedules are necessary in order to restore compet-
itive salary ranges that will allow for the recruiting and
retention of the highest quality faculty.
UNR Salary Schedules, Ref. H, filed in the Regents' Office.
UNLV Salary Schedules, Ref. I, filed in the Regents' Office.
Vice Chancellor Sparks reviewed the referenced material and
stated that these schedules are updated biannually. He
clarified that these updates are "range" schedules and that
it does not change anyone's salary. By updating these
schedules biannually the method examines similar positions
throughout the country and throughout land grant institu-
tions. The mid-points are determined and set accordingly.
He noted that UNLV has applied a higher cost-of-living index
to these schedules. The Las Vegas area has a 7% cost-of-
living index and the Reno area has a 5% cost-of-living in-
dex.
Mrs. Gallagher moved approval of the Handbook changes re-
garding Academic and Administrative Faculty Salary Schedules
at UNR and UNLV. Mrs. Sparks seconded. Motion carried.
Chairman Eardley relinquished the gavel to Vice Chairman Graves.
Mrs. Berkley and Mr. Klaich returned to the meeting; Mrs. Sparks
left the meeting.
15. Information Only: Gaming Education Profile, UNLV
Following a request from members of the Board, David J.
Christianson, Dean of the William F. Harrah College of
Hotel Administration, UNLV, and Nevada Assemblywoman Sandra
Tiffany provided a profile of UNLV Gaming Education as con-
tained in Ref. N, filed in the Regents' Office.
Dr. Christianson gave an historical profile of gaming edu-
cation at UNLV. In 1966 a Nevada Resort Association Grant
was provided for gaming education and in 1970 the State of
Nevada assumed funding for this program. The first gaming
courses were taught in 1967 by using gaming executives.
In 1970 a Gaming Resource Center was established at the
Dickinson Library and has been redesignated as a Special
Gaming Collection. In 1983 the program moved into Beam Hall
as a College of its own. A casino lab with gaming tables
and slot machines of 1975 vintage was set up, but became
very outdated. The program received a grant from Cliff
Jones to help defray some of the costs. The program now
publishes the "Hotel and Casino Law Letter" and "Gaming
Control Law". The Boyd family established a Distinguished
Gaming Chair and Dr. Jim Kilby has been named to that posi-
tion. The program began the Mead Dixon Gaming Lecture
Series.
There are 13 difference course offerings at the undergradu-
ate level and 4 graduate courses. The William F. Harrah
College of Hotel Administration teaches more courses in
hospitality than any other school in the country. Since
1986 the College has done much work with research and
industry in this field.
Dean Christianson reported that there is an articulation
agreement on gaming courses and student transfers with CCSN.
Several conferences, seminars and publications have already
been accomplished and many are forthcoming. The College is
management oriented with emphasis on hands-on experiences.
The College will be hiring a full-time position with re-
quired gaming control experience and gaming experience.
There are 3 faculty members in the industry who offer train-
ing in gaming management.
Mrs. Sparks returned to the meeting.
The College sponsors seminars for gaming operators and regu-
lators. Management development programs, gaming training
sessions and/or consulting have been requested by and con-
ducted for several corporations and gaming operations. The
College sponsors an annual 3-week management development
program for Australian gaming club operators and executives.
The seminars are supplemented with tours of gaming opera-
tions and roundtable discussions with gaming industry exec-
utives.
The College has several publication projects. In conjunc-
tion with the Nevada Gaming Attorneys Association and ACE
Denken, the UNLV International Gaming Institute will pub-
lish the "Gaming Industry Review". In 1994, two textbooks
will be published through the UNLV International Gaming
Management Institute.
Several persons have been contacted to solicit feedback on
what the gaming program should be focusing on in gaming
education. From this information, the program is in the
process of expanding the role of the gaming institute and
becoming the premier locale of gaming. Gaming research,
regulation and policy, professional development, distance
education, and dissemination of information are goals of
the institute. The gaming institute is in a position for
education and information on gaming, and it continues to
position itself to take on the leadership role in gaming
education.
In summation, Dean Christianson stated that the UNLV gaming
program is unique in its focus on managerial development and
specific problem-solving. In comparing Cornell University
with UNLV, Cornell can provide programs that UNLV cannot and
vice versa. UNLV can provide gaming courses, while Cornell
University cannot. Convention and exhibition service man-
agement is something else that other programs cannot pro-
vide to its students. He stated that gaming education is
the vehicle to carry UNLV into the 21st century. He felt
that by the end of the century every state will be involved
in gaming.
Mrs. Berkley stated that she was very excited about the
development of this program. The gaming industry is grow-
ing all over the country and internationally. Nevada should
be in the forefront of gaming education.
Mr. Foley stated that he did not get the briefing on UNR's
gaming program and questioned if the programs were compli-
mentary. Dean Christianson stated that Dr. Bill Eadington,
Director of Institute for Study of Gambling and Commercial
Gaming at UNR, has been involved in gaming education since
the 1970's. Study of gambling performed by Dr. Eadington
and his program is very good. However, UNLV is taking a
different approach in that it offers professional manage-
ment training in the gaming industry. The educational as-
pects of UNLV's program are a direct response to the gam-
ing industry. He stated that duplication in programming
should not be a problem with the immense expansion in the
gaming industry.
Dean Christianson introduced Vince Eade, Director of the
Institute. Dean Christianson explained that gaming pro-
grams are being established across the country, and UNLV
wants to be at the cutting edge of gaming education.
Mrs. Sparks stated that it was her understanding that UNLV
is working with federal regulators at the Indian reserva-
tions, and she questioned how this relationship is dif-
ferent than other gaming businesses. Dean Christianson
responded that UNLV works with the Center for Native Ameri-
can Gaming and sponsors projects with the Native American in
professional development. It is hoped that UNLV will be
able to hire a high-powered person to work on uniform gaming
regulations. At this time, there is no neutral ground be-
tween Native American gaming regulators and federal regula-
tors.
Vice Chairman Graves thanked Dean Christianson for an ex-
cellent and informative presentation.
Chairman Eardley resumed the gavel. Dr. Hammargren returned to
the meeting.
Nevada State Assemblywoman Sandra Tiffany addressed the
Board of Regents as a citizen in support of the gaming
program at UNLV. As an Assemblywoman, she serves on the
Ways and Means Committee, which reviews every State budget,
and she learned that the Gaming Control Board cannot main-
tain a consistent staff. She felt that UNLV's gaming pro-
gram could help in this regard by training students in the
gaming managerial professions.
Ms. Tiffany explained her involvement in supporting UNLV's
gaming program. In the beginning of her quest, she became
very frustrated, but after six months of discussion she
learned of UNLV's program and met with Dean Christianson and
Dr. Eade. She stated for the record that she wants to help
this program come to fruition. Nevada should be the leader
and premier gaming institute for the United States. Nevada
has a long history of gaming, and should be the authority
for other states as they develop their own gaming indus-
tries. She encouraged the Board of Regents to support this
program.
Mrs. Berkley responded that she agreed with Ms. Tiffany's
remarks. Ms. Tiffany stated, for the record, that higher
education in Nevada did take a beating during the last
legislative session, and she is willing to bring other
Legislators up to speed on what has actually happened to
higher education since that time.
Upon questioning, Ms. Tiffany stated that International
Gaming Technology has been very supportive of UNLV's pro-
gram, and others in the private sector are also supportive.
16. Approved Nominations for 1994 Honorary Associate Degrees
Dr. Hammargren moved, Mrs. Berkley seconded, that the
following persons be honored with an Honorary Associate
Degree and that the awards be presented at Commencement
at CCSN:
James E. Rogers
Angie Wallin
Motion carried.
Dr. Derby moved, Mrs. Berkley seconded, that the following
persons be honored with an Honorary Associate Degree and
that the awards be presented at Commencement at WNCC:
Weldon Lary
John Nicosia
Motion carried.
Mr. Foley moved, Mrs. Gallagher seconded, that the following
persons be honored with an Honorary Associate Degree and
that the awards be presented at Commencement at TMCC:
Paul A. Bible
Hal Plummer
Motion carried.
Mrs. Gallagher moved, Mrs. Berkley seconded, that the fol-
lowing persons be honored with an Honorary Associate Degree
and that the awards be presented at Commencement at NNCC:
Steve Hernandez
Eleanor Little-Prior
Motion carried.
17. Approved Nominations for 1994 Honorary Doctorate Degree
Awards
Mr. Graves moved, Mrs. Berkley seconded, that the following
persons be honored with an Honorary Doctorate Degree and
that the awards be presented at Commencement at UNLV:
Takatoshi Takemoto
Claudine Williams
Simon H. Zentner
Motion carried.
Mr. Klaich moved, Mrs. Berkley seconded, that the following
persons be honored with an Honorary Doctorate Degree and
that the awards be presented at Commencement at UNR:
Richard E. Lapchick
Charles J. Merdinger
Motion carried.
18. Approved Nominations for 1994 Distinguished Nevadan Awards
Distinguished Nevadan Awards are bestowed by the Board of
Regents to individuals who are present or former residents
of the State for "significant achievements contributing to
the cultural, economic, scientific, or social advancement
of Nevada and its people, or for exceptional service to the
State or nation that has influenced constructively the well-
being of mankind".
The 1994 Distinguished Nevadan recipients will be honored
at ceremonies in conjunction with Commencement in May.
Mrs. Berkley moved, Dr. Hammargren seconded, that the fol-
lowing persons be honored as Distinguished Nevadans and
that the awards be presented at Commencement at UNLV in
May, 1994:
Reverend Jerome Blankinship
William T. White
Motion carried.
Mrs. Sparks moved, Mrs. Berkley seconded, that the follow-
ing persons be honored as Distinguished Nevadans and that
the awards be presented at Commencement at UNR in May, 1994:
David W. Clark
Howard Hickson
Molly Knudtsen
Phillip G. Rose, II
Motion carried.
19. Approved Report of Chancellor's Ad Hoc Committee on Health
Care Benefits
In September 1993 Interim Chancellor Richardson appointed a
Committee of faculty experts on health care to examine the
State Employees' Health Care Benefit Plan and to prepare a
report for his and the Regents' consideration. He intro-
duced Dr. Mary A. Paterson, Assistant Professor Health Care
Administration, UNLV, and Chairman of the ad hoc Committee,
who presented the report. The report is contained in Ref.
O, filed in the Regents' Office. Exhibits were distributed
at the meeting and are also filed in the Regents' Office.
Dr. Paterson expressed her appreciation to the 7 members
who served on the Committee. Their assistance has been in-
valuable through this process.
Dr. Paterson relayed several actual incidents that have
happened to State employees with regard to health insurance
benefits. The UCCSN employee group is one of the largest
groups participating in the State health insurance program
and it should be remembered that they are important people.
Dr. Paterson gave 3 assumptions:
1. It should be agreed that we are all in this together.
Health insurance benefits are a complex issue, and
with Nevada's growth rate it becomes even more so.
2. We should learn from the past, but not dwell on it.
Everyone in the benefits field has tried to make it
work, but the time has come for change.
3. We need to work hard as a group and continue to move
forward.
She stated that the Committee recommends that effective
administrative processes be put in place for the State
employee health benefits plans. Improved administrative
processes are especially needed in information systems,
systematic assessment of employee preferences, and fiscal
and accounting practices. The Committee further recommends
the use of the Total Quality Management (TQM) process to
examine and suggest changes in these and other administra-
tive areas.
There are no easy fixes to this project. She suggested that
UCCSN begin discussing issues with State employees, and put
a process in place that will effect change that is wise and
well thought out with sufficient data. In order to support
the process, there is a need for technical expertise.
At the September Health Insurance Benefits meeting, the
Committee instituted an increase in employee health benefits
coverage. At that time, information was not available to
the Committee to make that type of decision. A survey was
conducted, and 49% of the 1400 responses received indicated
that there was no knowledge of network visits to doctors and
hospitals.
There needs to be better information on the fiscal impact
before changes are enforced. Estimates could vary widely.
There was a $3.3 million difference in the estimates. Esti-
mates must be made on reliable data, and the data needs to
reflect the amount placed on the various groups in the State
plan. She indicated that rates are similar between the HMO
plan and the self-funded plan, and information should be
made available so that employees can make an educated de-
cision and become wise consumers.
The issue of quality is poorly understood by employees.
There is a need to assess the quality of the health care
providers. Poor quality costs additional money, because
it is a hidden cost to the consumer. She informed the
Board that Provider Report Cards are being proposed in the
National Health Care Reform.
She stated that according to the actuary, Nevada spends
little on administrative costs. A budget must be considered
so that these issues can be brought forward.
Mrs. Sparks left the meeting.
Dr. Paterson stated that she wanted to present this report
in a positive light. Positive changes can be made. A
commitment is needed to improve the administrative process
and technical assistance in order to provide adequate
resources for the plan.
Mr. Klaich requested clarification on the plan's adminis-
trative costs, and Dr. Peterson responded that one of the
issues that is on the horizon is electronic networks for
the processing of claims, verification and remittance of
funds. It would cause an increase in cash flow to health
care providers, but would also demonstrate a significant
decrease in administrative costs and turnaround of claims,
filing and refiling of claims. She stated that it costs
$6.20 per claim, and 50-70% of that goes toward refiling
of the claim.
She informed the Board that some networks are already in
place, and there is an improvement in the rapidity of flow.
However, it also generates an exorbitant amount of data.
It is not an inexpensive process. While there is an
improvement, the health care provider is the winner with
this process. Management Information System (MIS) staff
will need to be increased and trained to work the system
efficiently. There is a future in this project, but in
actuality it is not a net savings for the consumer.
Dr. Hammargren moved to accept the report of the Chancel-
lor's ad hoc Committee on Health Care Benefits. Mrs.
Gallagher seconded.
Dr. Hammargren informed the Board that insurance companies
usually do not want to quickly process claims. Claims can
take up to 1 1/2 years to finalize.
Chairman Eardley questioned if most of the insurance claim
problems are with the provider, and Dr. Paterson stated
that the answer is very complicated, but, yes, there is an
element of provider costs implicated with this issue.
Quality care and cost are certainly related. If employees
expect high technological medicine, then it will cost more
money.
Interim Chancellor Richardson stated that he hopes the
Chancellor's ad hoc Committee on Health Care Benefits would
continue in an advisory capacity to the Board of Regents
and the Council of Presidents. He will meet with the Coun-
cil of Presidents to develop an action plan in order to
keep the issue alive and to discuss the findings with the
State's Committee on Health Care Benefits and other employ-
ee organizations. As issues are brought forward, Dr.
Richardson stated that he would bring them to the attention
of the Board.
Dr. Derby requested more information and a broader dis-
cussion to be held at a later date. Dr. Hammargren sug-
gested that a follow-up report be given in 3 months.
Mrs. Gallagher cautioned the Board that the health care
issue is in a fluid state at this time. She had recently
received an 8-page summary of the nation's health care
plan and it is continually changing. She agreed that UCCSN
must stay apprised of the health care issues in Nevada, but
suggested that no action be taken at this time until final-
ization of the nation's health care reform draws nearer.
Any action that is taken now may be wrong. She offered
her assistance, as she sits on the Blue Cross/Blue Shield
Board of Directors.
Motion carried.
Dr. Richardson reaffirmed that he would be discussing this
report with the Council of Presidents, Chancellor's staff,
and the ad hoc Committee members. Dr. Derby requested
that Board action must be given prior to approaching the
Governor on this issue.
Mr. Graves agreed with Mrs. Gallagher, and suggested that
the Chancellor and the Committee proceed, but proceed
cautiously.
Mrs. Sparks returned to the meeting.
President Meacham invited those in attendance to CCSN's dedica-
tion of Phase IV at the Cheyenne Campus to be held this day
at 5:30 P.M.
20. Approved Handbook Change, Summer Session Fees, Community
Colleges
Approved a Handbook change, Title 4, Chapter 17, Section
10, Summer Session fees from $30 to $33 and to change the
policy to be the same as for the Universities.
Summer School Registration Fee, UNR UNLV CCSN NNCC TMCC WNCC
per credit (*This is the
Academic Year Registration
fee, per credit, plus $3.)
for undergraduate courses * * * * * *
for graduate courses * * NA NA NA NA
Vice Chancellor Sparks indicated that the proposed language
will allow the Community Colleges to have the same policy
as the Universities, in that the policy will now automati-
cally adjust Summer Session fee increases to the academic
session fee increases.
Mr. Foley moved approval of the Handbook change regarding
Summer Session fees for Community Colleges. Mrs. Gallagher
seconded. Motion carried.
21. Approved the Expenditure of Increased Student Fees, UNR
The student fees to UCCSN's State appropriated and author-
ized Instruction Budget at UNR are estimated to be about
$600,000 more than the current budget. Permission was
requested to seek approval by the Interim Finance Commit-
tee to spend these additional fees.
Vice Chancellor Sparks reported that no other UCCSN insti-
tution has indicated they will have increased student fees.
He noted that the estimation of $600,000 is a top end esti-
mate, and that it will most likely be less. These student
fees are derived mainly from non-resident student tuition
fees at UNR.
Mrs. Gallager moved approval to augment up to $600,000 for
the Instruction Budget at UNR and granted permission to seek
approval by the Interim Finance Committee to spend these
additional fees. Mrs. Sparks seconded.
Mr. Klaich asked if there was a budget prepared on the
expenditures of these funds, and President Crowley stated
that, as information only, the following projects may be
addressed by these fees as one-time expenses:
Campus cabling
Campus safety
additional vehicles
Campus lighting
increased security of facilities
K-16 initiative
program review
software for Campus information system
equipment needs
Mr. Klaich requested a budget of expenditures be presented
to the Board, in addition to the information that UNR will
be presenting to the Interim Finance Committee.
Mr. Graves questioned why was there an increase in non-state
tuition, and President Crowley responded that the increase
is largely due to immigration of students from California.
However, it is difficult to determine the cause of all the
factors because some situations may be caused by program
offerings, affordability, or the need for courses for com-
pletion of programs, to name a few.
President Maxson stated that UNLV has experienced an in-
crease in non-resident tuition from its original projec-
tions. Although UNLV did have many non-resident students,
it also had to turn away many mon-resident students.
Motion carried.
The open meeting recessed at 4:30 P.M. and reconvened at 9:10
A.M. Friday, February 18, 1994, with all Regents present except
Regents Hammargren, Klaich, Price, Sparks and Whitley.
General Counsel Klasic introduced newly appointed Assistant
General Counsel Marc Cardinalli. Mr. Cardinalli will serve in
the southern System Administration Office.
22. Approved Extension of Channel 5 Lease Agreement, UNR
Approved the Channel 5 Public Broadcasting, Inc. lease
agreement signed December 12, 1983 be extended for a period
of 5 years to December 12, 1998. It is anticipated however,
that a new agreement will become operative before the
1998 date.
Interim Chancellor Richardson stated that he and General
Counsel Klasic have reviewed this lease agreement and
recommend approval. General Counsel Klasic stated that a
major concern with the lease was the length of time and
receiving value for the lease property. However, these
concerns are not out of line and he felt that UNR will be
getting a good value from this venture.
President Crowley distributed background information re-
garding Channel 5. During its inception there was a larger
vision to encompass the establishment of a National Public
Radio outlet on Campus, using the then low power KUNR as a
base station. Due to conflicting priorities, it was deter-
mined to have a community television station rather than a
station owned by UNR. Donations were raised along with
support throughout the community. However, UNR needs more
space and so does Channel 5. UNR requested Channel 5 to
continue its location on the UNR Campus and they have agreed
and have begun a fund-raising campaign for a new building.
President Crowley introduced Jim Pagliarini, General Manager
of KNPB-Channel 5, who has been the principal developer of
Channel 5 since its inception.
Mr. Pagliarini stated that there has been confusion of
identity between UNR and Channel 5, especially with fund
raising. A feasibility study was conducted in the community
and Channel 5 received offers to relocate off the UNR Campus
so that Channel 5 would have its very own identity and not
be confused with UNR. However, Channel 5 has determined
that, at this time, they would like to remain on the UNR
Campus.
He thanked the Board of Regents for their continued support
and consideration of this item.
Mrs. Sparks entered the meeting.
Mrs. Gallagher moved approval of the Channel 5 Public
Broadcasting, Inc. lease agreement signed December 12, 1983
to be extended for a period of 5 years to December 12, 1998.
Dr. Derby seconded.
Mr. Graves stated that he has requested a copy of the lease
agreement prior to consideration. He stated that he was
aware that Channel 5 is a great thing for northern Nevada,
but he did not support this item, because he has not seen
the proposed lease agreement. He questioned whether the
approval of this item was imperative at this meeting, or
whether it could wait until next meeting after the lease is
reviewed.
Mr. Pagliarini stated that it was not imperative to approve
the lease at this meeting; however, the Kreske Foundation
has offered Channel 5 a $200,000 matching grant and security
of this agreement is needed prior to this grant. By moving
the agenda item to the March 31-April 1 Board meeting may
require some changes to the planning process for Channel 5.
For one thing, the announcement of the grant cannot happen
until conditions have been met.
Mrs. Sparks questioned if the Channel 5 lease agreements
were available at this time. Interim Chancellor Richardson
stated that there was a copy available. Mrs. Berkley re-
quested to review any contracts that have to be specifically
considered by the Board of Regents in the future.
Mr. Graves moved to table the item until copies are made
available to and reviewed by the members of the Board. Mrs.
Berkley seconded. Motion carried.
Discussion is continued after item 23.
Mrs. Whitley entered the meeting.
23. Approved Handbook Addition, Administrative Salary Schedule,
Community Colleges
At the October 8-9, 1992 meeting of the Board of Regents,
former Chancellor Dawson shared with the Board that the
previous year had witnessed the completion of work on bring-
ing internal equity to the Community College faculty compen-
sation. He felt that the logical extension of this work
should be the development of a compensation system of in-
ternal equity for Community College Administrators and that
the Hay Group would be commissioned to assist in such an
endeavor. Work has been completed on an administrative
salary schedule and was presented to the Board by Laurence
Karsh of Hay Management Consultants.
Supporting documentation, Ref. J, filed in the Regents'
Office. Salary Schedule, Ref. K, filed in the Regents'
Office.
This salary schedule will be a Handbook addition, Title 4,
Chapter 3, Section 20.
Interim Chancellor Richardson informed the Board that Mr.
Doug Burris, Director of Community College Affairs, and
the Community College Presidents have been working on this
project for well over a year. Mr. Burris described the
process used on this project that is also found in the
October 8-9, 1992 Board of Regents' minutes.
Mr. Burris stated that he had contacted several organiza-
tions that had worked with the Hay Group and found that
they are a very experienced and reputable firm. He dis-
tributed information related to the Hay Group. Mr. Laurence
Karsh of the Hay Group was assigned to this project, and he
has met with staff of all of the Community Colleges and the
Chancellor's office. A draft was completed this past Summer
and was submitted to each of the Community Colleges for re-
view. The Community College staff involved were invited to
hear the presentation by Mr. Karsh in October 1993. The
information was also shared with the Community College
Compensation Committee. Faculty had requested that the
final report to the Board of Regents be held until the Com-
munity Colleges had had time to analyze the report, and it
was agreed to make the presentation at the February 1994
meeting rather than December or January.
Mr. Burris indicated that action is requested on the UCCSN
Community College System Salary Ranges as contained in Ref.
K. Ref. J is supporting documentation to the presentation.
Mr. Karsh reported it was determined that there was a need
for a comprehensive study to be conducted on the salary for
mid-management. The UCCSN Community Colleges are currently
structured as five autonomous institutions, without one
central entity making judgments on personnel decisions.
The System Administration felt that internal and external
salary equity for similar positions and responsibilities
were needed.
Mr. Karsh informed the Board that the Hay Group includes
everyone affected to the greatest extent possible in devel-
oping its recommendations. He insisted that each Community
College President and two other senior Administrators sit
on the review committee. The objective of this committee
was to collect data, evaluate various job standards, and
analyze the situation as reflected among the Community
Colleges. The committee found that there were varying pay
practices, and there was disparity in the pay practices.
The committee confirmed what was being voiced by the Ad-
ministrators that there was a need for some type of a common
structure. A national survey was conducted using multi-
campus systems, single campus systems and relative sampling
was conducted.
Mr. Karsh proceeded to review the Community Colleges Compen-
sation Project, as contained in Ref. J. The documentation
contained information on the following:
Project Steps
Salary Administration Program Guidelines
Assignment to Salary Range
Salary grades Ranking Assignment
Movement within a Salary Range
Mr. Graves left the meeting.
Mr. Karsh explained the UCCSN Community College Mid-Manage-
ment Level System Salary Ranges: Administrative Management
and Supervisory Positions, Fiscal 1994/95, as contained in
Ref. K. This schedules was developed by analyzing national
data compiled by CUPA on multi-campus systems, and a special
survey of the western states conducted by the Hay Group.
The average pay practices in the western states was ahead
of the CUPA national average pay practices. The middle
range is the average of the western states.
Mr. Karsh stated that there is a need for internal equity,
and these steps can provide the institutions with the
leverage to reach this equity.
Mr. Graves returned to the meeting.
One of the most important program objectives is to promote
the highest possible degree of morale and performance. Mr.
Karsh stated that a change to the current structure is need-
ed, but cautioned that change is always difficult. He be-
lieved that the Hay Group's proposal can bring about that
needed change for UCCSN's Community Colleges.
Mr. Burris indicated that the proposed mid-management salary
range is a different concept than the faculty salary sched-
ule for Community Colleges, but it is similar to what is in
place for the Universities at this time. There will be no
loss of pay for anyone. These guidelines and procedures
can be amended, revised or updated at any time. He stated
that the Community College Presidents unanimously agree with
this proposal.
Mrs. Sparks moved approval of the UCCSN Community College
System Salary Ranges as contained in Ref. K. Mrs. Whitley
seconded.
Upon questioning Mr. Burris responded that this salary
range will affect those mid-management personnel below the
Vice Presidents, excluding instructional faculty, library
personnel and counseling staff.
Mr. Graves stated that he was impressed with the study and
was in support of this proposal. Mrs. Whitley agreed and
added that she has always been an advocate for comparing
salary with performance. Mrs. Gallagher, too, felt strongly
about this issue and felt it was long overdue. Mrs. Sparks
indicated that over the past 10 years the Community Colleges
have been striving for excellence and equity and she felt
this would aid in this goal.
Mrs. Gallagher stated that she has worked several times with
Mr. Karsh on various projects and appreciated his profes-
sionalism.
TMCC Faculty Senate Chairman Dan Mc Clure stated that TMCC's
Senate conducted a survey which indicated that there was not
strong support for this salary schedule, but that there was
an awareness that there needs to be a change. It has been
suggested that an evaluation tool be developed Systemwide,
individual information on how points are assigned be pre-
sented, an appeals process be developed, and that each Cam-
pus is unique in responding to its own community so the
issue on uniformity should be revisited. He felt that re-
cruitment within the System will be compromised.
WNCC Faculty Senate Chairman Mark Melrose stated that im-
proved morale will take place at the higher end of the
schedule, but not at the lower end. He pointed out that
Total Quality Management (TQM) was not followed in this
process. There is a clear distinction between Administra-
tion and faculty. He supports Dr. Balboni's request to
submit this information to the System Compensation Committee
for further review.
CCSN Faculty Senate Chairman Alan Balboni stated that the
CCSN Faculty Senate represents all professional employees,
Administrators and instructional faculty. A committee was
established to study this report and make recommendations.
The recommendations were voted on by the CCSN Faculty Sen-
ate which indicated opposition to proposed salary ranges
until the following conditions were met:
1) Parity of salaries for Administration
2) Implementation of equity adjustments be explained
3) An appeals process be developed
Therefore, he requested that the System Compensation Commit-
tee be allowed to study this and make recommendations.
In his own opinion, Dr. Balboni stated that this report is
long overdue and was professionally prepared; however, there
are legitimate concerns that need to be addressed. The
process is a little different, in that it compared western
states as its basis, and he felt that the System Compensa-
tion Committee should review this information and that this
agenda item be brought back to the Board for consideration
at its March 31-April 1 meeting.
Mrs. Sparks stated that it was her understanding that this
report has been under discussion by the Community Colleges
since 1992, and she felt that was enough time for it to be
reviewed. Dr. Balboni stated that there was substantial
involvement at the Community College level, but he is sug-
gesting that the System Compensation Committee be given the
opportunity for input.
NNCC Faculty Senate Chairman Scott Hawkins stated that
NNCC's Faculty Senate did give this project considerable
thought, and he recommended approval with recommendations.
Ms. Candace Kant, Chairman of the Community College Compen-
sation Committee, stated that this Committee is concerned
because of lack of involvement in the process. The Com-
munity Colleges were only involved in the survey and hear-
ing where the results were presented. Throughout the proc-
ess there was not meaningful dialogue between those who
would be impacted. The Community College Compensation
Committee only became involved during the end of the proc-
ess and after the fact. At that time the Committee was giv-
en the opportunity to respond to the report. The Committee
feels that there are several issues that still need to be
resolved, such as the cost to implement the salary plan,
the implementation plan -- is it to be gradual or all at
once -- the appeals process, the recognition of years of
experience, the development of an evaluation tool, and the
comparison study in relation to the other peer groups and
academic faculty. She did not argue about the goal of the
study and commended the study.
UNLV Faculty Senate Chairman John Swetnam did not under-
stand the performance standards description and felt that
they need to be reexamined. The descriptions are not
comparable to the University's standards. Dr. Karsh re-
viewed and explained the performance standards descriptions
for the Board members.
Mr. Karsh responded to several comments that were made by
the Faculty Senate Chairmen and others. He agreed with
the recommendation that an evaluation tool be developed.
However, with regard to the appeals process recommendation,
he felt that the process is common for classified positions,
not management positions. He clarified that the Presidents
and Vice Presidents served on the committee that helped
develop this project because of their managerial judgments.
He suggested that this Committee review this process on an
ongoing basis. With regard to the improvement of morale,
this will take time and is not expected to happen immediate-
ly. As employees become familiar with the process and learn
what is expected from them, they will recognize its useful-
ness. Mr. Karsh stated that there is an interrelation be-
tween the academic and administrative faculty schedules and
that is the reason why the comparison study was conducted
with the western states and the national data rather than
just the academic faculty.
Mr. Karsh disagreed with the statements that were made re-
garding lack of involvement on the study. There was much
more involvement on this project because of the expecta-
tions of this organization. He stated that there must be
a level of sensitivity because individuals have a great
deal of trouble with the objective of this project. The
Presidents were asked to review those positions lower than
the Presidency because the project did not want to lose
sight of the roles within the organization. Mr. Karsh felt
that having the committee evaluate those positions below
the executive administrative structure would be the most
objective way to handle this project.
Mrs. Whitley stated that she strongly agreed with an appeals
process and recognition of years of service.
A lengthy discussion was held on the performance standards
descriptions.
Mrs. Berkley requested that this item be placed on the next
agenda to allow for the System Compensation Committee to
review the report. Mr. Graves agreed.
Interim Chancellor Richardson offered 3 observations from
this discussion:
1) Administrators are part of the Faculty Senates and
the Faculty Senate Chairmen were representing their
Administration throughout this discussion.
2) Board members need to recognize that they are only
being requested to take action on the UCCSN Com-
munity College System Salary Ranges, not the sup-
porting documentation.
3) The request to postpone action on this item in
order that additional time is allowed for the System
Compensation Committee to review this report is in-
appropriate. The Committee has had since October to
consider this report.
He recognized that there will never be 100% consensus on
this report, but this is an issue that has been before the
Board of Regents for several years and has been unresolved.
This is the only group of employees not under a range or
schedule. This project has taken 1 1/2 years to develop
and to give yet another extension is inappropriate. He
recommended that the Board take action on this item.
Dr. Patricia Butler, CCSN Director of Student Development,
stated that, as an Administrator and Co-Chair of CCSN's
committee, she applauds the Hay Group for this report and
felt it to be very fair. She urged the Board to accept the
report and stated the mid-management staff involved do
approve this report.
Upon questioning, Dr. Richardson responded that the System
Compensation Committee has not met since last Fall to de-
velop a position on these recommendations. Ms. Kant stated
that the report was presented in October and the last time
the System Compensation Committee met was in November. This
did not allow the Committee enough time to consider the re-
port. A meeting has been scheduled February 25, 1994, and
the Committee would like to discuss this report at that
time.
Mrs. Whitley questioned if consideration was given to the
ranges of salary with regard to the scope and size of the
individual Community Colleges, and Mr. Karsh responded in
the affirmative. If there was a particular job that had a
greater impact, then a higher grade was assigned to that
position. The Job Evaluation Committee made these assign-
ments, but there is a common salary range for all the
Community Colleges.
A discussion was held on whether to allow additional time
for the System Compensation Committee to consider the re-
port, or to vote on the salary range with the understand-
ing that the supporting documentation could be further
discussed at a later meeting.
Interim Chancellor Richardson clarified that it was never
his intent or the intent of the Council of Presidents or
Mr. Karsh to bring this report before the Board without ever
looking at it again. If the Board so chooses to approve the
salary ranges, then work would be continued on the support-
ing documentation and other issues raised during this dis-
cussion. He felt that he had given ample opportunity and
adequate time for response to this report. The Chancellor's
staff and Mr. Karsh have worked with the Compensation Com-
mittee and Faculty Senates, and he urged the Board to con-
sider this item at this time.
Upon roll call vote:
Aye: Regents Derby, Foley, Gallagher, Hammargren,
Sparks, Whitley
No : Regents Berkley, Graves
Motion carried.
Mrs. Sparks requested a follow-up report on this issue.
Dr. Derby left the meeting.
22. Approved Extension of Channel 5 Lease Agreement, UNR
(continued)
UNR Vice President Ashok Dhingra requested a minor change to
the lease that reflects the lessee would never be able to
sublet the property and the lessor shall receive first op-
tion if there would ever be extra space made available by
the lessee.
Mr. Graves moved to withdraw his motion to table the item.
Mrs. Berkley seconded. Motion carried.
Mr. Graves moved approval of the Channel 5 Public Broad-
casting, Inc. lease agreement signed December 12, 1983 be
extended for a period of five years to December 12, 1998,
as amended. Mrs. Berkley seconded. Motion carried.
24. Approved the New Channel 5 Lease Agreement, UNR
Channel 5, Public Broadcasting, Inc., is undergoing a fund-
raising effort for a new 19,500 square foot facility located
on the UNR Campus. Approved a new 99 year lease with Chan-
nel 5 with the lease to begin when the premises are ready
for occupancy, which is anticipated to be within 2-5 years
as depending upon fund raising and construction.
Mr. Graves moved approval of a new 99 year lease between UNR
and Channel 5, Public Broadcasting, Inc., with the lease to
begin when the premises are ready for occupancy. Mrs.
Berkley seconded. Motion carried.
Dr. Derby returned to the meeting.
25. Report and Recommendations of the Academic, Research and
Student Affairs Committee
A report and recommendations of the Academic, Research and
Student Affairs Committee meeting held February 17, 1994,
was made by Regent Dorothy Gallagher, Chairman.
(1) Approved the Ph. D. in Engineering with majors in Civil
and Environmental Engineering, Electrical Engineering
and Mechanical Engineering at UNLV, as contained in
Ref. ARS-1.
This proposal will expand the current Ph. D. in Civil
and Environment Engineering into an "umbrella" doctoral
program in Engineering, which will include 3 separate
majors.
The Ph. D. in Engineering will provide needed graduates
for government, industry and higher education as well
as support a strong research base which will contribute
to the economic development needs of southern Nevada.
The proposed structure will ensure a unified set of
admission and degree requirements for all students
and facilitate interdisciplinary research programs.
This program was identified in UNLV's academic master
plan as a high priority. The proposal has been dis-
cussed with UNR officials, and the UNR Dean of Engi-
neering recognizes the need to establish such a program
at UNLV. A minimal impact on the UNR Ph. D. programs
is anticipated. A thorough review of existing related
programs at UNLV indicates that they are of high
quality.
The estimate of State resources needed by the 4th year
if $142,000, which will be used to provide graduate
assistantships and additional library resources. Ex-
ternal funds will be actively pursued through grants,
gifts and contracts to be used for Research Associate
positions, equipment, supplies and travel. No addi-
tional facilities are needed to implement the program.
Mr. Klaich questioned if this was a common structure
for a Ph. D. program, and Senior Vice President John
Unrue responded that it was a common format. At one
time UNR did have this type of structure in place, as
did UCLA.
Mrs. Berkley stated that she supported this program
and that it was timely in that it is good for the
System, community, State of Nevada and UNLV.
Chairman Gallagher stated that she had received several
supportive letters and telephone calls regarding this
program. She, too, is very pleased with this program.
Mr. Klaich added that it was gratifying to see the
maturity and progress of this program. It has arrived
at the status in which the Administration, faculty and
staff stated it would be from 10 years ago.
Dr. William Wells, Dean, stated that he has worked with
the System Office and closely with UNR's Dean Jim
Hendricks, who was very helpful, and with DRI and the
UNR's engineering program. He stated that most flag-
ship Universities depend on the reputation of the
Ph. D. programs. UNLV continues to bring great faculty
and students to this program. The program is a money
maker and a good business for UNLV. It has been very
competitive in raising additional dollars and he stated
that in time the program will pay for itself.
Dean Wells stated that this program is good for diver-
sification in the State of Nevada. Out-of-state com-
panies look at higher education when relocating to
another state. There is a need for a quality program
and Ph. D. program in Engineering.
Dean Wells introduced those present from the Engineer-
ing Advisory Board. President Maxson stated that it
was these people who put this program together, and
who helped the super computer for UNLV.
Mr. Foley stated that when he began his term as Regent,
the Engineering Department was located in a one-story
building with 200-300 students. Now the program has
expanded tremendously. He congratulated Dean Wells,
Senior Vice President Unrue, and staff for implementing
this multi-disciplinary program at UNLV.
Mrs. Sparks stated that this program has gone to great
lengths to fulfill its mission to help the community
at a professional level and by making it a Statewide
program. She agreed that it was the Engineering Ad-
visory Board that was largely responsible for this
program at UNLV.
Dr. Unrue stated that they have worked very hard on
this program. He thanked the Engineering Advisory
Board members, and colleagues from UNR and DRI. UNLV
has worked with them on this program and has strived
not to duplicate the program, but to enrich the pro-
gram.
(2) New Business - Chairman Gallagher stated that the
Academic Master Plans would be addressed by the full
Board of Regents.
Mrs. Gallagher moved approval of the report and recommenda-
tions of the Academic, Research and Student Affairs Commit-
tee. Mrs. Sparks seconded. Motion carried.
26. Report and Recommendations of the Audit Committee
A report and recommendations of the Audit Committee meeting
held February 11, 1994 was made by Regent June Whitley,
acting Chairman. She requested Secretary Moser to high-
light the action taken by the Committee at its February 11,
1994 meeting.
(1) Acting Director John Love presented the follow-up
audit report on the Department of Personnel and
Affirmative Action, CCSN, July 1, 1992 through
June 30, 1993, stating that all recommendations have
been adopted.
(2) Acting Director John Love presented the follow-up
audit report on the Institute of Business and Industry
at TMCC, July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993, stating
that all recommendations have been adopted. Included
in the report were copies of the forms and documents
to be used to attain these corrections.
(3) Discussion of State Purchasing - Mr. Ray Moran, Di-
rector of Purchasing at UNR, reported on his visits
and discussions with State Purchasing. He relayed
that they are focusing on customer service and are
phasing out the warehousing focus. In answer to a
question, Mr. Moran reported that UCCSN had done
about $200,000 in business with State Purchasing, but
that if UCCSN is able to obtain items at a lower cost,
it does so. Mr. Moran stated there was a 5% markup
on items; however, Vice President Buster Neel, UNLV,
related their markup was now 15%. Mr. Moran stated
he would check into that.
(4- Financial Statements and Constructive Service Letters,
(19) UCCSN, UNR, UNLV, DRI, CCSN, TMCC, WNCC, NNCC - Acting
Director John Love introduced the Deloitte & Touche
team who presented the Financial Statements and Con-
structive Service Letters for the System and each of
the institutions: Mr. Dennis Gaugher, Partner on
Engagement; Mr. Bryan Merryman, Senior Manager and
Senior Engagement Officer; Mr. Steve Dodd, Partner;
Ms. Laura Humberger, In-Charge Assistant: and Mr.
Clay Jorgenson, In-Charge Assistant.
Copies of the Financial Statements and Constructive
Service Letters are filed in the Regents' Office.
Mr. Gauger stated that Deloitte & Touche had issued
16 reports for the System and its institutions, but
they did not cover such ancillary groups as the alumni
associations, any boosters groups or foundations as
these are controlled by separate boards of directors
and their funds generally are received by contribu-
tions and donations.
He stated that they had issued an unqualified opinion,
that the information had been fairly presented and
applied on a consistent basis.
Mr. Dodd reported that currently the IRS is investi-
gating Colleges and Universities across the country.
He related that Deloitte & Touche is conducting
studies for a number of Colleges and suggested they
might contract with UCCSN for this matter. Vice
Chancellor Sparks stated that additional information
would be needed on the possible liability of the
System and the scope and cost of such a study before
a decision could be reached. Mr. Love stated that
he is in discussion with various individuals concern-
ing this matter and would report back to the Committee
at a later date.
Significant Accounting Policies - There were no policy
changes this year.
Management Judgments and Accounting Estimates - These
were based on knowledge and past experience. No
changes were noted.
Significant Audit Adjustments - Audit adjustments were
discussed with the controllers who agreed to implement
all suggestions.
Disagreements with Management - There were none.
Consultation with Other Accountants - There were none.
Mr. Bryan Merryman stated that each division or Campus
was following the internal control systems. He dis-
cussed the auditors' comments on the reportable condi-
tions:
Account Reconciliations - UCCSN installed the CUFS
accounting system during this past year. A number of
problems occurred in bringing the system on line, and
particularly so without additional personnel and
additional technical personnel. The State reporting
date was not met, and a number of reconcilations had
to be made by hand; however, the State report was
completed in December.
Modifications to the CUFS program are needed and will
be forthcoming as time, personnel and funds permit.
Mr. Love stated that the findings are basically with
the larger institutions because of the size and volume
of transactions.
Mr. Tom Judy, Controller at UNR, stated that they are
embarrassed to have these comments, but because of
implementing the new financial system there were more
problems than anticipated. He assured the Committee
that reconciliations will be complete by the end of
the FY, and once that is done, they can determine the
support needed to end the problem.
Vice Chancellor Sparks stated that the Committee
should keep in mind that much of the new system is
very good, that this matter is only a part of the new
financial system and the problem is being reviewed and
solutions will be forthcoming. He continued that time
and resources are needed to work out these problems.
He reminded the Committee that the State only funded
about 1/3 of the UCCSN request for this project and
it is anticipated a further request will be included
in the 1995-97 Biennial Budget Request. Mr. Judy ex-
plained that the new system is beneficial in that
bills are paid quicker, information is available on a
more timely basis and financial statements are gener-
ated more timely. He stressed that the problems can
be solved and staff is working on short and long term
solutions, with a report to the Board expected by the
March meeting.
Fixed Asset System - Mr. Mike Sauer, Controller at
UNLV, stated that their inventory has been on a PC
system and the reconcilation problem is with con-
verting this system into CUFS, but is underway and
will be completed this year.
Self Insurance - Mr. Merryman stated that a "lag
analysis" is needed for the System which is an ap-
proximation of actual liability in financial state-
ments, not reserves. Mr. Sparks explained that be-
cause of increased unemployment payments, the reserves
had been reduced. At that time, UCCSN appealed to the
State for additional funding for this area, which was
authorized and appropriated. In answer to a question,
Mr. Sparks stated that System personnel currently are
addressing this issue and if additional funds are re-
quested, it will be a part of the Biennial Budget
Request.
Investment Income - Mr. Merryman stated that this was
a reporting problem only and had been corrected prior
to the issuance of the audit financial statements.
Electronic Data Processing - Mr. Merryman stated this
was an administration matter which would be completely
implemented by the end of February. Dr. Don Zitter,
Director of Computing Services, stated that the
Disaster Recovery Plan requires constant review, which
is done, and that testing is an on-going process.
TMCC Financial Statements - Vice Chancellor Sparks
stated that the TMCC Financial Statement as presented
at this meeting is the official report for the insti-
tution. He explained that TMCC Faculty, represented
by the Nevada Faculty Alliance, currently is in col-
lective bargaining negotiations with the Board of
Regents. They have held press conferences and made
statements to the media concerning their review of
financial statements which shows a surplus of funds at
TMCC which could be used to hire additional faculty.
Mr. Dennis Gaugher stated that Deloitte & Touche are
the official external auditors for UCCSN and they
audit the System and the individual Campuses based
on materiality factor which is the level of signifi-
cance to the reader. They look at expenses based on
that level.
Mr. Merryman reported on the TMCC Fund balances in
the Financial Statement which shows a balance of $27
million, of which $22.5 million is the value of the
plant and equipment. He stated that most govern-
mental entities report on a different basis; however,
the System is on an accrual basis. Continuing, he
stated that the only unrestricted fund balance is
$992,557, which are combined accounts. Mr. Merryman
stated that because they are labeled "unrestricted"
does not mean those funds have not been earmarked for
a specific purpose.
Mr. Steve Salaber, Director of Budget and Planning,
TMCC, stated that approximately $300,000 of this
$992,557 is self-supporting budgets, $100,000 is
Estate Tax Credit Balance to be used for equipment
as specified by Legislative intent, and $400,000
is for bookstore and cafeteria contracts. The re-
mainder of the funds are specified for items/areas
as specified by Board of Regents policy. He related
that last year when the budget cuts were made, the
decision had been made to stop spending in these
categories and therefore reserves have increased.
Vice Chancellor Sparks explained that by State Law if
an agency augments State funds with, say, self-sup-
porting funds, the State would simply reduce the State
funds given to the institution. In addition, if the
State should allow such a transfer, it would be neces-
sary for the institution to provide those funds every
year in the future. Mr. Sparks stated that UCCSN has
been successful in keeping non-State supported budgets
out of the State budgeting process. If they are ever
included, it could lead to the replacement of State
funds with non-State funds and more State controls
over the expenditure of these funds.
(20) Acting Director John Love presented the audit report
of the Purchasing Department, UNR, July 1, 1992
through June 30, 1993. The report is filed in the
Regents' Office.
Mrs. Whitley moved approval of the report and recommenda-
tions of the Audit Committee. Mr. Graves seconded. Motion
carried.
27. Report and Recommendations of the Status of Women Committee
A report and recommendations of the Status of Women Commit-
tee meeting held February 4, 1994, was made by Regent Jill
Derby, Chairman.
(1) Discussion of Final Report - In February 1992, the Com-
mittee published "Interim Report and Recommendations
of the Regents' Ad Hoc Committee on the Status of
Women", which contained a review of the issues sur-
rounding the status of women within the UCCSN and made
recommendations for action. The Committee reviewed
this report and agreed that it should be a reference
document for measuring progress and as a vision state-
ment. Chairman Derby pointed out that the report has
been used at conferences, most specifically at the
National ACCT Conference in Toronto.
The Committee agreed that the interim report had
focused on the workplace. The final report will
encompass that and add the student focus, which has
been the major activity for this past year.
During the review, a number of assignments were made
to various Committee members for writing, or re-writing
certain portions of the report, which will be sent to
Tamela Gorden in the System Office. Ms. Gorden will
incorporate these changes into a draft of the final
report and distribute to all Committee members and
Campus Chairs for review.
It is planned that the report will be presented to
the Committee and the Board of Regents at its March 31-
April 1, 1994 meeting.
(2) Pending UCCSN Code Changes - Chairman Derby explained
that TMCC had offered a number of proposed revisions
to Chapter 6 of the UCCSN Code and that General Counsel
Donald Klasic had responded in a memorandum dated
September 23, 1993.
1. Section 6.6.1 concerning who may issue warnings or
reprimands after an expedited disciplinary procedure.
After discussion, it was agreed that this was an in-
ternal matter, and that TMCC will institute policies
to handle the situation.
2. Section 6.6.8 concerning the term "reasonable
time". Following discussion it was agreed that the
term should be defined and a time should be estab-
lished. President Meacham stated that 5 days is a
very unreasonable time for a President, explaining
that he had been out of his office attending various
System meetings for 4 days that week, plus attending
this meeting on the afternoon of the 5th day.
3. Section 6.12.7 concerning complainant filing with
an outside agency, with the controversy being 5 versus
6 months for completion of disciplinary cases. As
there apparently is a federal statute of limitation
of 180 days for filing claims, TMCC had proposed that
cases be required to be completed within 5 months, in
order to give the complainant adequate time to file
with an outside agency once internal processes are
exhausted.
This was determined to be an issue of providing ade-
quate information to complainants. Jill Winter, UNR,
suggested that each Campus assign a specific person
or office to be responsible for informing the com-
plainant of his rights in filing with outside agencies.
In fact, that is the procedure used at UNR and several
other institutions.
4. Section 6.8.1 concerning the proposed change from
"administrative officer" to "affirmative action of-
ficer". Dr. Brosnan stated that UNLV did not want
the term changed to "affirmative action officer"; that
they have appointed 3 administrative officers, 1 for
classified, 1 for faculty and 1 for students. Dr.
Meacham reported that CCSN wants to keep their proce-
dure in that complaints are filed with the affirmative
action officer. Mike Coray, UNR, suggested that TMCC
might wish to appoint administrative officers.
The Campus committees also disagreed with General
Counsel Klasic's proposal that all Chapter 6 complaints
be filed with the President's Office.
Chairman Derby thanked the Committee members and Campus
Chairs and committees for all the time and efforts on these
matters.
Dr. Derby moved approval of the report and recommendations
of the Status of Women Committee. Mrs. Gallagher seconded.
Motion carried.
28. Report and Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on Ethnic
Minority Affairs
(1) Information Oly: Consideration of Draft Recommenda-
tions - The Committee reviewed and discussed draft
recommendations that have been compiled by staff from
prior Committee meetings, Campus reports, and from the
Blue Ribbon Task Force, as contained in Ref. EM-1.
Recommendations, when finalized by the Committee, will
be submitted to the Board of Regents for their review
and adoption.
Chairman Whitley questioned how classified employees
are addressed with regard to ethnic minority affairs
and Interim Vice Chancellor Karen Steinberg stated
that the annual Affirmative Action report will be
presented to the Board of Regents at the March 31-April
1, 1994 meeting. She stated that the numbers of clas-
sified employees are closer to parity in the work-
force than the numbers of professional employees. The
institutions have the ability to increase diversity at
the professional level, but the classified level is
regulated by the State Personnel System. The State
Personnel System requires that persons be tested for
particular occupations. A ranked list is prepared
from the results of the test and employers must hire
from the top five on the list. There is no ability
to intervene in classified hires. Mrs. Steinberg
suggested that the State Personnel Director be con-
tacted by the System to discuss the Committee's con-
cerns. Chairman Whitley directed the Chancellor's
staff to initiate a discussion on diversity issues
with the State Personnel Director and to report back
to the Committee at its next meeting.
Chairman Whitley stated that she was pleased with all
the Campus reports, but she did not feel that the re-
ports specified ways to intervene in the hiring proc-
ess. Each President responded to Chairman Whitley's
statement and all stated that in some way their insti-
tution's Affirmative Action Office does intervene in
the hiring process.
In response to a question of how the UCCSN can address
diversity in the hiring process, Chairman Whitley
responded that UCCSN could work with the State Person-
nel Department and relay the Committee's concerns to
the Governor.
Mrs. Steinberg stated that all the institutions did a
good job in providing information that was requested
of them. The reports have been shared throughout the
System.
Mrs. Berkley suggested that a bill draft be prepared
to request autonomy of the System's employees from the
State employee system. In response, Mrs. Steinberg
stated that this issue has been raised in the past.
There are some very positive issues to this suggestion;
however, she suggested that the System's classified
personnel be contacted for their input. Although
there are some positive issues, there are also some
drawbacks, such as employment protection and benefits.
Mrs. Berkley suggested that this be explored, and Mrs.
Steinberg suggested that the Committee begin its dia-
logue with the State Personnel Department before ex-
ploring this issue any further.
Mr. Klaich cautioned the Committee in that the System
is already taking on an immense legislative agenda and
he suggested that the issue of equal opportunity be
addressed before taking on the issue of autonomy.
Chairman Whitley requested the Committee to continue
reviewing the submitted recommendations. Mrs. Stein-
berg stated that 3 recommendations were extracted from
prior Committee meetings, Campus reports, and from the
Blue Ribbon Task Force, and recommendations reflect
Systemwide concerns.
A lengthy discussion was held regarding the recommenda-
tion for a high level position within the Chancellor's
Office to be responsible for facilitating diversity
efforts. The issue was addressed at the Council of
Presidents' meeting and it was agreed that there is a
need for a high level position, but there was a concern
whether that person would have enough work to keep busy
without taking the duties away from the institutions.
If it was determined to have this high level responsi-
bility in the System Administration Office, then the
responsibilities should be delegated to a current posi-
tion; however, it was determined that the System
Administration staff was already spread thin. The
Council did not see this position as a full-time posi-
tion. The goal is clear, but the Council had a prob-
lem with the practicality of the recommendation.
Interim Chancellor Richardson reminded the Committee
that the System Administration Office is in a down-
sizing mode at this time due to the budget reductions
placed on the office. There is already considerable
pressure placed on the employees. He stated that he
has discussed this issue formally of combining this
function with another position within the office, but
has not come to a conclusion. During these delibera-
tions, it has occurred to him that throughout the
UCCSN there is a growing need for additional focus
on personnel matters. He mentioned that 2 years ago
the System was not engaged in collective bargaining,
which takes a considerable amount of time. He informed
the members that the System Administration Office em-
ploys a classified personnel officer that might needed
to be upgraded to the high level position that is being
discussed. The System agrees on the goal of diversity
and affirmative action, but is not sure how to reach
that goal at this time.
Mr. Klaich stated that the Status of Women Committee is
also formulating a report with recommendations and has
a similar concern for a high level position, but was
attentive to the budget crisis. The Status of Women
Committee determined that it should try to stay away
from issues that would take the report out of the
education realm and into the budgetary realm. He
stated that he was concerned with some of the proposed
recommendations by the ad hoc Committee on Ethnic Mi-
nority Affairs with that regard. He stated that he
was understanding of the additional work that is need-
ed in this area, but was concerned with recommenda-
tions that need funding. He suggested that if the
funds are not available and not forthcoming, then
those recommendations should be addressed as a Board's
priority.
Dr. Derby added that the affirmative action officer's
traditional role is to monitor federal guidelines, but
that there is no educational role to go forward with
gender inequities. The System does not have an exist-
ing structure to adequately advance such a goal, but
needs to consider how to modify that structure, or
direct additional responsibilities as an advocate to
a current position so that affirmative action officers
have someone to work with at the System level.
Mr. Klaich agreed that a large portion of an affirma-
tive action officer's responsibilities is to monitor
federal guidelines and update forms continually; how-
ever he was hopeful that these required duties would
not encompass such a large part of those duties, so
that they would be able to implement other programs,
such as diversity in the institution's curricula.
Dr. Derby supported the recommendation that the Board
should include a permanent standing committee on
diversity in its committee structure. She felt that
gender equity would also fall under this issue and
that the Status of Women Committee needs to address
this issue further. If the ad hoc Committee on Ethnic
Minority Affairs and the Status of Women Committee
should be combined, she felt that the issue of gender
equity might get shorted. She suggested that this
recommendation be further discussed and that a goal
and mission statement be developed to formulate the
concerns and structure of the Committee.
Mrs. Sparks felt that if the recommendation should
adopt minority goals for students, Administrators,
faculty and staff with timelines for reaching those
goals, and require annual reports from the Campuses
as well as from the System level detailing progress
against the goals a permanent Committee would not
be necessary.
Chairman Whitley stated that action was implemented
in the past, and issues did not come to fruition. Mrs.
Sparks stated that if specific guidelines were imple-
mented, then issues would be regularly addressed.
Mr. Klaich disagreed, and stated that a standing com-
mittee of the Board served a valid function by
sending a message of the importance of the issue. He
felt that the workload is not the problem, but the
organization of the committee structure is the prob-
lem. When committees meet during the regularly sched-
uled Board meetings, it takes up considerable time.
If the reports are thoroughly reviewed, then it should
not become a large duplication of effort.
Mrs. Sparks clarified that staff must make arrangements
for every committee meeting, prepare minutes, along
with follow-up directives by the committee to the staff
and action items are then considered by the full Board
of Regents.
Dr. Derby stated that by establishing a standing com-
mittee of the Board, it becomes a very important mes-
sage to the Campuses. Some work is worth doing and
tends to carry out the established strategic direc-
tions. She did not feel that it was a great workload
for such an important goal. Without the Regents' com-
mittee she did not feel that progress would have been
made as the Regents intended.
Dr. Hammargren agreed with Mrs. Sparks, and referred
to the Research Affairs Committee that has recently
been incorporated into a larger committee, the Academic
Research and Student Affairs Committee. He felt that
one committee could handle the various issues.
Chairman Whitley requested further discussion on the
recommendations. Mrs. Steinberg suggested that she
bring back to the Committee a more global recommenda-
tion than what had been presented.
Chairman Whitley requested action on the recommendation
regarding the engagement of a consultant to review the
work of the ad hoc Committee and its recommendations,
and to provide input to the Board for future work. She
suggested Dr. Reginald Wilson be contacted. She felt
that the Board should accept this recommendation so
that the other recommendations could then go forward
to Dr. Wilson for his consideration.
UNLV Affirmative Action Officer John Lujan addressed
the Committee and felt than an additional recommenda-
tion regarding multi-cultural classes to be included
in the general core courses throughout the System be
considered. Chairman Whitley directed staff to add
this to the Committee's recommendations. Mrs. Stein-
berg felt that this issue needed further discussion
by the Committee since the recommendation is already
a strategic direction of the System. She explained
that it could be put forth to encourage the institu-
tions to implement this, but she felt it would be
better addressed by the institutions. Chairman
Whitley requested each institution to set a timetable
for development of ethnic studies courses.
President Maxson agreed with Mrs. Steinberg, and felt
that the institutions need to have input on this issue
and felt it should come up from the institutions, not
down from the Board of Regents.
Dr. Derby affirmed that this issue was contained in the
strategic directions, and agreed that it should be dis-
cussed at the Campus level.
UNLV Faculty Senate Chairman John Swetnam informed the
Committee that this issue has been discussed by UNLV's
Faculty Senate. He mentioned that the Legislature
mandates constitutional courses, and the institutions
develop their own curriculum including these mandates.
Dr. Hammargren did not think it was an infringement on
the faculty's rights, as imposed by Dr. Swetnam, but
an educating of the citizens in ethnic studies and
diversity.
Interim Chancellor Richardson stated that the Board's
present position in sending a message is addressed in
the strategic directions. Each entity in higher educa-
tion, whether it be Board members, staff, faculty, have
their own responsibilities to carry forward. The cur-
riculum is the purview of the faculty, as is the grad-
uation requirements, and course content. He cautioned
the Committee to be very careful before mandating cur-
riculum.
Dr. Hammargren felt that the students should have in-
put. The issue of academic freedom can be argued con-
tinuously, even at private institutions, but if the
the Legislature distributes funding to higher educa-
tion, then they have the right to infringe on academic
freedom.
Chairman Whitley stated that the Committee is not in-
fringing on academic freedom, but did want to see that
recommendation coming forward at the institutions over
the next 2-year span.
Mrs. Whitley moved approval of the report and recommenda-
tions of the ad hoc Committee on Ethnic Minority Affairs
and will further discuss the recommendations and bring the
final recommendations to the Board of Regents for consider-
ation. Mr. Graves seconded. Motion carried.
29. Report and Recommendations of the Ad Hoc Foundation Liaison
Committee
A report and recommendations of the ad hoc Foundation Liai-
son Committee meeting held February 17, 1994 was made by
Regent Lonnie Hammargren, Chairman.
(1) Approved the proposed guidelines as contained in the
Handbook changes, Title 4, Chapter 10, in Ref. FL-1,
Section 9, UCCSN and Member Institution Foundations
Administrative and Accounting Guidelines, and Ref.
FL-2, Section 8, Approval, Announcement and Acknow-
ledgement of Gifts and Grants. The reference material
is filed in the Regents' Office.
Chairman Hammargren reviewed the following objectives:
A. To make the reporting of gifts and grants to the
institutions simpler for the foundation and more
complete and reconcilable for the Regents.
B. To assure the arm's length relationship between the
institution and the foundation by recognizing not
only the foundation's independence to manage its
own affairs, but also its responsibility to the
members of the corporation.
C. To shift the responsibility for compliance with
the Board of Regents' policy, with respect to
foundations, from the foundation to the institu-
tions' Presidents who have the responsibility for
carrying out all Board of Regents' policies and
procedures.
Chairman Hammargren introduced Mrs. Edna Brigham, En-
dowment Director, and Ms. Janet Mac Donald, Deputy
Treasurer. Mrs. Brigham extended her appreciation to
the Administration and foundation's staffs of each of
the institutions who have worked on this proposal.
The proposed guidelines have had the benefit of review
by the foundations, Administration and the Council of
Presidents.
Two sections, which have been deferred for further
discussion with institutional Presidents and founda-
tion Administrators, will be submitted as addenda to
these guidelines two or three months.
Mrs. Sparks stated she recently attended CCSN's founda-
tion meeting, and it was brought to her attention that
it would be difficult for the smaller institutions to
develop a budget, as requested in the two highlighted
sections. Mrs. Brigham stated that this will be dis-
cussed with the institutions.
Interim Chancellor Richardson clarified that an ex-
tensive discussion on the proposed guidelines was
held during the recent Council of President's meeting.
The Chancellor's staff and Presidents could not reach
an agreement on the two highlighted sections; however,
the staff and Presidents did feel that it was important
to bring forward to the Committee the proposed guide-
lines that have complete agreement and to continue to
negotiate those two sections in order to bring them
back to the Committee for consideration. He stated
that these proposed guidelines are a high priority in
the System office and in the community.
Upon questioning, Mrs. Brigham stated that all founda-
tions have a complete understanding of these proposed
guidelines. She informed the Committee that the very
first draft was distributed in October 1993, and the
Chancellor's staff have met with the various entities
and have drafted the proposed guidelines based on these
discussions.
Mr. Klaich stated that he was confident in the work
performed by Interim Chancellor Richardson, Mrs.
Brigham and Ms. Mac Donald. After many long discus-
sions, these documents have brought us forward and
with a different spirit.
Mrs. Brigham stated that she was tremendously impressed
with the foundations' Administration because of their
thoughtfulness and concern regarding this proposal.
Mrs. Gallagher suggested that Title 4, Chapter 10 in
Ref. FL-1, Section 9.A.1, UCCSN and Member Institution
Foundations Administrative and Accounting Guidelines,
include a statement regarding the academic master plans
and the facilities master plans so that donors can
understand that the System does have master plans prior
to the gifting to specified interests. Ms. Mac Donald
stated that Title 4, Chapter 10, Section 8, Approval
Announcement and Acknowledgement of Gifts and Grants,
addresses Mrs. Gallagher's concern.
Mrs. Brigham further clarified that with regard to
host account donations, the institutions must abide
by the present Board of Regents' policy.
Dr. Eardley questioned the reporting process in that
gifts are sometimes reported several months after it
has been accepted by the institution. Also he felt
that any remuneration for employees should come to the
Board of Regents prior to acceptance. Ms. Mac Donald
assured Dr. Eardley that his concerns have been ad-
dressed by the ad hoc Foundation Liaison Committee.
Mrs. Gallagher questioned whether contracts with
promoters, such as Nike, have to be approved by the
Board, and it was determined that these types of
contracts do not have to come before the Board for
consideration. Mrs. Brigham clarified that the
Chancellor's ad hoc Committee on UCCSN/Private Part-
nership will be addressing this issue and will bring
to the Board of Regents an addendum to the proposed
Section 8, Gifts, Contracts and Sponsored Program
policy statement as referenced.
President Maxson clarified that professors who write
or consult must abide by Board policy on the amount
of time spent on those tasks. He stated that many
faculty members have private businesses that do not
interfere with their University responsibilities.
Mrs. Sparks felt that there are two different issues
being discussed. The proposed guidelines that are
being considered at this time have nothing to do with
contracts, book rights or academic issues. The poli-
cies before the Board are strictly for foundation and
other gifts to the UCCSN institutions.
President Meacham stated that there is a need for
change in the current policy, but he still has a slight
uneasiness about the proposed guidelines. There is
some potential for unintended burden placed on the
foundations. He stated that if experience dictates
additional changes, he is hopeful the Board would
consider amending these proposed guidelines. Mrs.
Brigham stated that these proposed guidelines are
intended to simplify the reporting of gifts and grants,
which will relieve some of the burden on staff.
Mrs. Gallagher congratulated Mrs. Brigham and Ms.
Mac Donald for their work on such an important issue.
Chairman Hammargren agreed and extended them apprecia-
tion on behalf of the Board.
President Meacham moved to dissolve the ad hoc Foundation
Liaison Committee, but it was pointed out that the two
highlighted sections will still need to come before the
Committee for consideration.
Dr. Hammargren moved approval of the report and recommenda-
tions of the ad hoc Foundation Liaison Committee. Mr.
Graves seconded. Motion carried.
Mr. Foley left the meeting.
30. Information Only: Regents' Workshop
UCCSN Budget - A workshop on the UCCSN Budget was presented
by Interim Chancellor Richardson and Vice Chancellor Sparks.
Recommendations were presented on the 1995-97 biennium
budget requests on the following:
(a) Minor Repairs and Improvements
(b) New Construction and Major Renovations
(c) Parameters to be Used in the Construction of the
"Adjusted Base" and "Program Maintenance" Budgets
(d) Priority Requests for New Funding
Ref. L, Minors Repairs and Improvements Projects, filed in
the Regents' Office. Ref. M, 1995-97 Capital Improvement
Projects, filed in the Regents' Office.
These recommendations were reviewed with the Board at this
meeting with final approval to be requested at the March
31-April 1 meeting.
Vice Chancellor Sparks reviewed the Minor Repairs and Im-
provements Projects as found in Ref. L. He explained that
in the past the $5 million annual slot tax revenue used
to be allocated to the Higher Education Capital Construc-
tion (HECC) fund. This revenue is now allocated to the
State's General Fund, and in the past UCCSN has been suc-
cessful in receiving a like amount from the Legislature
during each biennium since 1983 for Minor Repairs and Im-
provement Projects. Historically, UCCSN has requested $10
million over the biennium to correspond with this annual $5
million slot tax revenue. However, because of the addi-
tional demands for repairs and improvement projects, the
Presidents are requesting an additional $2 million, making
the total request for minor repairs and improvements proj-
ects $12 million.
He explained that from the first $10 million request, the
minimum funding allocation to the institutions totals $7.1
million, with an additional $2.9 million challenge pool
allocation. NNCC, WNCC and DRI will be allocated a mini-
mum of $250,000; TMCC will be allocated a minimum of
$500,000; CCSN will be allocated a minimum of $750,000;
UNR will be allocated a minimum of $2,900,000; UNLV will
be allocated a minimum of $2,100,000; and the System Ad-
ministration will be allocated a minimum of $100,000. The
challenge pool allocations are found in Ref. L, along with
the requests for the added $2 million.
Mr. Sparks explained the 1995-97 capital improvement re-
quests for new construction and major remodel projects and
described the formula process used in preparing this re-
quest. The new construction recommendations are a result
of the facility space data analysis. He reviewed the space
allocations which were based on classrooms, research, labo-
ratories, offices and libraries. Ref. M indicates the
aggregate of those calculations by the end of 1997. Each
institution lists the square footage for total space re-
quired, total space available, additional space needed,
and a percentage deficit. Upon questioning, Mr. Sparks
responded that the DRI 130.6% deficit incorporates the
total space for the entire institute.
Dr. Hammargren left the meeting.
Mr. Sparks indicated that the figures regarding space
utilization includes all construction that is currently
underway at this time.
Mr. Graves questioned why there was such a difference be-
tween UNR and UNLV's total space required, and Mr. Sparks
responded that UNR's space includes the College of Agri-
culture's Experiment Stations throughout the State, the
Cooperative Extension Program, the School of Medicine and
the Mackay School of Mines.
Mr. Sparks stated that the Council of Presidents endorsed
Ref. M.
Mr. Sparks continued to review the deficits and stated that
the data indicate that space needed in 1997 is less than
that projected for 1995 two years ago, due to adjusted
enrollment projections. DRI shows the highest overall
percentage deficit (130.6%), and WNCC the highest insti-
tutional facility percentage deficit (116.5%).
Dr. Derby questioned how it is that one institution, such
as WNCC, can incur such a high deficit, and would the
master plans aid in the process in the future. Mr. Sparks
responded that UCCSN has not been successful since the 1991
legislative session in addressing space needs. At that
time, WNCC was high on the priority list, but the State ran
out of funding.
Upon questioning, Mr. Sparks indicated that the space utili-
zation formulas do account for the fact that Community Col-
leges use leased space.
Interim Vice Chancellor Steinberg added that the formulas
are very complex and many factors are taken into consider-
ation. She stated that the data are available and she
would be happy to discuss this with the Regents in small
groups or one-on-one, because of the complexity. She
stated that she is not an expert, but has used national
standards in compiling these data.
Interim Chancellor Richardson stated that this material has
been presented to the members of the Board for information.
In cooperation with the Council of Presidents, the approach
and standards have been adopted and the Chancellor's Office
has worked with each of the Presidents and institutions to
reach a comfort level on this information. Dr. Richardson
indicated he would send a summary on this data, and sched-
ule small meetings with those Regents who would like further
information.
Dr. Richardson stated that the University Presidents felt
that the leasing of space would be advantageous for the
Community Colleges and that the reverse would also be true.
There is an internal check and balance on this information
and it has been agreed that this is an equitable approach.
President Gwaltney stated that the principal is very im-
portant, but not everyone is happy. He pledged that he
would support this process, because it is much better than
that used several years ago. TMCC is very proud of the
Old Town Mall leased space. He suggested that the formulas
need refinement to include the leased space for TMCC and
noted that these refinements may not work for the other
institutions.
In discussing the 10 priorities, Mr. Sparks stated that the
ultimate costs cannot be developed at this time, so the
priority list reports estimated figures. He explained that
this list was compiled by using the top priority of each
institution. He reviewed the priorities and highlighted
that the new construction costs are estimated at $113.5
million. The Major Renovations and Additions are not list-
ed in priority order under priority number 9. Priority
number 10 addresses new projects for advance planning and
design. The total cumulative cost for the 10 priorities
is $131 million.
Mr. Sparks explained the State's bonding capacity. There
is approximately $90 million remaining in bonding capacity.
An outside consultant has reviewed the State's debt and its
ability to service debt. The consultant studied Nevada's
debt ratio and stated that the norm is 5% across the country
while Nevada's debt is at 8%. The consultant recommended
that Nevada begin to lower that rate. The State did not
issue all the debt at the last legislative session and by
the end of this biennium the debt rate should be reduced
to about 6%. Mr. Sparks reported that about $174 million
of debt capacity will be available by the next legislative
session and the critical issue for Nevada is not necessarily
the remaining debt capacity, but rather the State's ability
to service that debt.
Mr. Sparks indicated that there will probably be a General
Fund surplus, but not enough for $131 million for UCCSN's
Capital Improvement Projects.
Upon questioning, Mr. Sparks reported that the State has
built the first phase of the Lovelock Prison, and Governor
Miller wants that facility opened in 1995. The second
phase of the prison will cost approximately $25-30 million;
this is dependent on its prisoner population. He has been
made aware that a new legislative building or remodeling
of the current facility is being considered. Also a park-
ing garage for the new office building in Las Vegas is
being considered. The Employment Security facility may be
funded with some federal monies.
Mr. Sparks indicated that he does not know how serious the
Legislature is with regard to lowering the bond debt ratio.
UCCSN received $37 million last year. Basically all new
debt was earmarked for higher education at the last session.
Mr. Sparks reported that the parameters used to construct
the adjusted base and the program maintenance request will
be considered by the Board at its next regularly scheduled
meeting. UCCSN needs a 23% increase at this rate, the
general fund increase needs to be at least 30%.
Finally, Mr. Sparks reported that the priority request for
new funding has not been completed. The recommendation will
be presented at the next meeting. He mentioned that the
first category will deal with new funding for salary and
benefits.
31. Chancellor's Search
A discussion was held regarding steps to take relative to
the Chancellor Search.
Chairman Eardley requested General Counsel Klasic to review
the options that have already been made public and any addi-
tional options that the Board may wish to consider.
General Counsel Klasic reminded the Board that at the Janu-
ary 21, 1994 special meeting of the Board, several options
were presented on how to proceed with the Chancellor's
Search. The Board of Regents moved approval to cancel the
Chancellor's Search, approach the next legislative session
to make changes to the Open Records Law as regards confi-
dentiality of initial applications, and direct General
Counsel Klasic to research other options. Mr. Klasic stated
that he has been in trial since that meeting, and could not
perform the adequate research; however, he has prepared a
list of 5 options for the Board to consider.
1) Reopen the search, utilizing same procedures that
have been used in the past. However, this option
raises the question of whether to follow the At-
torney General's opinion or not. To abide by the
opinion would narrow the applicant pool, and to
ignore the opinion would bring about litigation.
2) Reopen the search, delegating the initial screening
of applications to a UCCSN committee and letting the
Board of Regents make the selection of finalists.
However, the Open Records Law applies to all public
officers and offices and UCCSN would also be sub-
ject to abide by the Attorney General's opinion.
3) Reopen the search, hiring a private firm to conduct
the initial screening and letting the Board of
Regents make the selection of the finalists. This
approach could legally happen; however, in the
long-run the media would challenge the letter of
the law and indicate that public monies are being
used to pay this private firm.
4) Do not reopen the search, wait until the next legis-
lative session convenes and proposed legislation
that would resolve these problems.
5) Do not reopen the search, promote from within. The
Board of Regents' policy does allow for this to take
place, as found in Title 4, Chapter 8, Section 6 of
the Board of Regents' Handbook.
Dr. Derby stated that it is important that the Board secure
leadership for the System. She stated that the Board of
Regents should be involved in the selection of its chief
executive officer. Dr. Derby presented another option:
6) Chairman of the Board appoint a committee of the
Board to develop an expanded list of options to be
presented to the full Board.
Dr. Derby stated that this decision is very important and
should not be rushed without all the options presented.
Mrs. Berkley stated that she did not agree with options 1-5
listed above, and was satisfied with option 6, forming a
committee to consider additional options. She stated that
she did not have a problem with the current law, but with
the Attorney General's opinion. Mrs. Berkley had prepared
and sent a brief to the members of the Board. In her brief
she developed another alternative that she felt had merit
as another option:
7) Have a judicial review of the current structure.
Mrs. Berkley did not feel that the Attorney General's opin-
ion was a definitive action taken by a court of law. Mrs.
Berkley felt that the Board had a 50% chance in having a
legal interpretation from the judicial branch.
Mr. Foley stated that he had read Mrs. Berkley's brief and
the cases associated with searches. He stated that he was
in agreement with Dr. Derby's option to create a committee
to review the options and if approved, he would urge the
committee to give considerable thought to a legal challenge.
He did not support reopening the search process at this
time.
Mr. Klasic stated that the Board could file a motion for a
declaratory relief, but there needs to be a true defendant,
and at this time there is not one. He offered two sugges-
tions: 1) the Board take action to institute a closed
search and let someone sue the Board of Regents; or 2) the
Board identify a defendant, such as the news media or the
Nevada Press Association, and allow them the authority to
sue the Board of Regents.
Mrs. Berkley stated that she had brought the above sugges-
tion to the Board at its special meeting, and learned that
to proceed with the search process would give the Board
greater ammunition to appear in court. Mr. Klasic reiter-
ated that there still needs to be a true defendant in order
to use the ammunition. She questioned why this did not be-
come a viable option at that time, and Chairman Eardley
responded that as a lay Board advice was given by the
Board's attorney and was taken into consideration. Mr.
Klasic stated that the Board of Regents chose another op-
tion rather than seeking a legal suit.
Mrs. Gallagher stated that when the Board made its deci-
sion it was approved that the Board would challenge the law
at the next legislative session; however, she had a problem
with that because there needs to be a process in place that
will work throughout the entire System. She stated that the
Chancellor's search will not be the only search the Board
will have to handle. She stated that she felt very strong-
ly that time is of the essence because there are System
issues which need to be dealt with immediately. At this
point in her career as a Regent, she stated that she had
performed enough searches and learned that you can never
be too careful with a search process and the Board must be
diligent in selecting the right person for the position.
However, only until that person actually performs the duties
will the Board really know that it has hired the right per-
son for the job, especially in Nevada. Often the person is
adaptable to Nevada lifestyle, but the spouse finds it
difficult to live here.
Mrs. Gallagher stated that she has been very concerned about
changing the search process because she feels very strongly
about the current process. A precedence is being set not
only for the Chancellor's search, but for other searches
throughout the System. However, the Chancellor's search is
a bit different in that it is truly a Board of Regents'
selection as its chief executive officer. The Board has
recently spent much time on the Chancellor's job descrip-
tion. She stated that she has a problem with disregarding
everything that the Board has worked so very hard in achiev-
ing and taking the issue to court. She felt that the Sys-
tem's attorney should decide whether the Board should chal-
lenge the law in court. But in the meantime, there are
System issues that need immediate attention.
She questioned the members of the Board in what would be
better for the system at this time -- to go into a legisla-
tive session with a pending search, or, if a search is
started right now and completed prior to the legislative
session, would it be appropriate to ask this new employee
to take over a job of this magnitude without knowing the
players and politics of Nevada? She felt that it would
be much better for the Board of Regents to promote from
within at this time.
Mrs. Gallagher stated that the System has a very competent
individual in its present Interim Chancellor, John Richard-
son. He has demonstrated impeccable administrative leader-
ship, which is so very important to a lay Board. She sug-
gested that the Board should take its time in selecting a
permanent Chancellor and allow the Interim Chancellor to
get the System back in shape so that future candidates
would want to come to work for UCCSN. Mrs. Gallagher in-
formed the Board that if so approved, Dr. Richardson has
agreed to this promotion.
Mrs. Gallagher moved that the Board of Regents promote Dr.
John A. Richardson by appointing him to Chancellor of the
University and Community College System of Nevada, effec-
tive immediately and subject to mutual agreement between
the Board and Dr. Richardson as to the terms and conditions
of his empoyment, and that the Chairman of the Board be
authorized to negotiate with Dr. Richardson on the terms and
conditions of employment with final approval by the Board.
Mr. Graves seconded.
Mr. Graves stated that he agreed with Mrs. Gallagher's re-
marks, and, that the Board of Regents needs to support the
judicial relief and immediately, at whatever cost and how-
ever the Board chooses to proceed, decide on a search
process. There will be many searches in the future that
the Board will need to perform. He felt that the "end
justifies the means"; however, he stated that he was con-
cerned with the process and the Affirmative Action regula-
tions. As a lay Board, all the members want to help higher
education as best as possible. He stated that if Dr. Rich-
ardson was in the private sector, that he would not hesitate
to hire him. Mr. Graves proceeded to read Dr. Richardson's
qualifications from his resume.
Mr. Graves stated that Dr. Richardson is an individual who
can lead the System. The UCCSN budget is very important and
the System needs someone right now who can lead it through
the next legislative session. Mr. Graves indicated that he
does not always agree with what Dr. Richardson recommends,
but he has always been prepared with a well thought out
opinion. Mr. Graves highly encouraged the Board to approve
the motion on the floor.
Mr. Foley questioned, as a point of order, if the agenda
item (#32) is properly noticed for the Board of Regents to
take action on an appointment from within to the position
of Chancellor without performing a search. Mr. Klasic
responded in the affirmative. Mr. Foley stated that he
challenged General Counsel's opinion.
Dr. Derby questioned the intent of the agenda language and
did not feel that it indicated that action might be taken
to make an appointment. She did not feel that this was
fair to the search process and in the spirit of the Open
Meeting Law, she felt it could be in violation.
Dr. Derby stated that this issue is not about a specific
personality. There is a wide consensus of the Board that
we do have an Interim Chancellor in place and there should
be no hurry in making a permanent selection. As Interim
Chancellor, Dr. Richardson does a good job, but Dr. Derby
stated that she was very concerned about the process. She
recommended that a committee be formed and that a designated
period of internship be established to allow for the Board
to have time to deliberate on this issue. She disagreed
with Mr. Graves, in that the "ends no not justify the
means". In higher education there is a collegial process
and it would be in violation of the process to go ahead
and make the appointment at this time. She stated that Mrs.
Gallagher referred to the risks of bringing in someone new
at this point in time. Dr. Derby stated that she believed
that good outcomes come from good processes. She reminded
the Board that there needs to be a competitive search proc-
ess. She reminded the Board members that diversity has
become a key issue of the Board and the Board should allow
the possibility to become diversified in the selection for
this position. She strongly encouraged the Board to explore
all possible options.
General Counsel Klasic stated that he stands by his inter-
pretation of the language of the agenda item; however, it
may result in litigation if the Board chooses to take ac-
tion. If two Board members feel that the language is am-
biguous, then it may be safe to say that there may be
outside officious groups who may pursue a lawsuit against
the Board of Regents on this matter. He suggested that the
Board table this item for a more acceptable agenda item.
Mr. Graves moved to table the above stated motion. Mrs.
Whitley seconded.
Upon questioning, Mr. Graves withdrew his motion.
Chairman Eardley noted for the record that Regent Daniel
Klaich was not present, but had requested that his message
be relayed to the Board. Chairman Eardley stated the fol-
lowing:
Mr. Klaich supports an open search with or without a
headhunter; that appointment of the Interim Chancellor
to Chancellor would be destructive at this point because
of the bad press it might cause both locally and nation-
ally. There are other searches coming up and this could
send a message that the process is not important. Mr.
Klaich feels that the law will not be changed, but the
Regents could try. If the law cannot be changed the
Board should develop a process which will comply with
the law.
In accordance with Board policy, Chairman Eardley requested
the Presidents, Faculty Senate Chairmen, student representa-
tives and public to comment on this issue.
President Crowley stated that even though he is a strong
believer of process, there are occasions when the balance
of factors outweighs the process. He stated that he sup-
ported the motion to appoint Dr. Richardson to the position
of Chancellor. The upcoming legislative session is a very
persuasive argument to make the appointment at this time.
President Maxson stated that he agreed with President Crow-
ley's remarks. President Maxson stated that he admires and
respects Dr. Richardson and felt that he would make a good
Chancellor for UCCSN. Although process is important in his
opinion if the search process was conducted the Board of
Regents would most likely have selected Dr. Richardson.
He supported the motion to appoint Dr. Richardson.
President Taranik agreed with his colleagues and added he
has enjoyed working with Dr. Richardson. With respect to
the agenda item, he supports the motion to appoint Dr.
Richardson because of the timing with future searches and
the upcoming Legislature. At this point in time, he did
not feel that the Regents would be able to select an in-
dividual who would be able to defend the UCCSN at the
Legislature. The Board should not be afraid of litigation
over the agenda item because the appointment of Dr. Richard-
son is the appropriate action to take and the System should
support Dr. Richardson.
President Calabro stated that he has worked with every
Chancellor that has been hired in Nevada, and from his ob-
servation, Dr. Richardson has proved himself. Dr. Calabro
stated that he looked forward to working with him during
the next legislative session. Dr. Richardson has been the
driving force behind interactive television, which is so
important to WNCC. The System is at a critical point and
the Board should select someone to move forward into the
legislative session with strong leadership.
President Remington stated that the Board needs to select
someone with University and Community College administra-
tion experience. He pointed out that there was a national
search conducted for the UCCSN's Vice Chancellor for Aca-
demic Affairs, and diversity was an issue at that time.
Dr. Richardson was one of the top finalists and was then
selected. He is a man of integrity and takes time to
talk with each President. Dr. Remington stated that he
was very impressed with Dr. Richardson.
President Meacham stated that he supports the motion to
appoint Dr. Richardson. He stated that he was concerned
with the interpretation of the legal challenge that may
come before this Board. He pointed out that the last time
there was a search for the Chancellor's position, because
of some applicant withdrawals Mr. Mark Dawson was appointed
to the position. He felt that Dr. Richardson is the best
candidate for the Chancellor's position.
President Gwaltney agreed with his colleagues. Dr. Richard-
son is very efficient and would make a great Chancellor.
He has the experience and will serve the State of Nevada
well in this position.
Unit Faculty Senate Chairman Chris Gaub stated that he
believes in Dr. Richardson and that he would make a good
Chancellor.
NNCC Faculty Senate Chairman Scott Hawkins stated that his
employment background is from the private industry and he
believed that the System did try to conduct an appropriate
search, but it did not work. He supported the motion of
the appointment of Dr. Richardson in order to move forward
as a higher educational system.
UNLV Faculty Senate Chairman John Swetnam stated that the
appointment of Dr. Richardson at this time would be a ter-
rible mistake, because Affirmative Action guidelines have
not been adhered to in this process. He also felt that if
the person is appointed from within, it becomes a political
issue. He asked if all subsequent searches were going to
be appointments without going through the appropriate
search process. He urged the Board not to make this ap-
pointment under these circumstances. He supported the idea
of forming a committee that would form options to bring back
to the Board for full discussion. Employment procedures
must be established to maintain confidentiality, Affirmative
Action guidelines and diversity.
TMCC Faculty Senate Chairman Dan Mc Clure agreed with Dr.
Swetnam's remarks. Searches are conducted throughout the
System all the time and Affirmative Action guidelines are
followed to allow for diversity. If an appointment is
made from within, the Board would be sending a message back
to the institutions that process is not important. Leaders
should follow the policies that have been established.
UNR Faculty Senate Chairman Phil Boardman stated that he
agreed with the remarks made by Dr. Derby and Dr. Swetnam.
He stated that faculty would view this proposed action as
very cynical without the Board of Regents following the
rules and regulations that it consistently reminds the
institutions to follow. The view from the bottom would
be very suspect if this action was taken.
CCSN Faculty Senate Chairman Alan Balboni suggested that the
Board consider the remarks made by Dr. Derby and Mr. Klaich.
He did not feel that the System was in a crisis situation
without a permanent Chancellor. He stated that if an ap-
pointment were to be made from within without the benefit
of following the Affirmative Action guidelines, the message
to the other institutions would be "one set of rules for
us, another set of rules for them".
Dr. Balboni read a statement by WNCC Faculty Senate Chairman
Mark Melrose, who agreed with the remarks made by Dr. Derby.
UNR Graduate Student Association President Samantha Hudson
stated that this is a very important issue for the students
because of the need to be very strong at the next legisla-
tive session. She suggested that the motion be withdrawn
completely at this time, and that at the next meeting a
clearer item be placed on the agenda to make an emergency
appointment of Dr. Richardson as Chancellor with a specific
time frame stated until an appropriate search can be con-
ducted.
WNCC USA President Mary Anne Lavelle agreed with the motion
to appoint Dr. Richardson as Chancellor, but with a specific
time frame until an appropriate search can be conducted.
Ms. Candace Kant, NFA representative, stated that she was
very concerned with this issue and was disturbed with the
credentials of one person being stated. Although Dr. Rich-
ardson has the qualifications to fulfill this position, it
is the process that is being questioned. She urged the
Board to consider Dr. Derby's remarks.
Assemblyman Robert Price stated that he has served as a
lawmaker for the last 20 years, and sponsored the Open
Meeting Law. He disagreed with the interpretation of the
agenda notice that was given by General Counsel Klasic.
This broad language does not meet the Open Meeting Law
requirements for taking action. He respectively suggested
that the item be denoted. He informed the Board that a
national search for the Director of the Legislative Council
Bureau was recently conducted in the open, and it resulted
with two in-house finalists. He respectively suggested
that the Board address this issue under a more defined
agenda item and that the Board not get involved in violating
the intent of the Open Meeting Law. Upon questioning, Mr.
Price stated that he was confident that the Open Meeting Law
would not be changed, although the Board could suggest a
change. He pointed out that across the country search proc-
esses are being conducted in the open.
Mr. Graves requested that Mr. Price keep an open mind if
approached by UCCSN to seek a change to the current law.
Mrs. Berkley stated that there was nothing wrong with the
Open Meeting Law, but with the legal opinion given by the
Attorney General. She stated she encourages Dr. Richardson
to apply for the position. She felt that the Board should
work within the parameters that have been set. She suggest-
ed that if Dr. Richardson was willing, he could remain as
Interim Chancellor for a length of time.
Mrs. Berkley stated that she was upset with the Chancellor's
staff, in that within 24-hours of the Attorney General's
opinion letters were sent out to the applicants, and that
she had been advised that the Board could take legal action
at a later date. This information was not revealed at the
time the search was terminated.
Mrs. Gallagher withdrew the motion. Mr. Graves withdrew
the second.
Mr. Foley moved approval of the appointment of a Regents'
committee, as suggested by Dr. Derby, who will undertake
and review all of the possible options and review of a
possible law suit precipitated by the Board regarding the
search process. Dr. Derby seconded. Motion carried.
Chairman Eardley appointed the members of the ad hoc Chan-
cellor's Search Committee to serve on the Regents' Special
Committee of the Board. He directed the Committee to work
with General Counsel Klasic.
Chairman Eardley apologized to Dr. Richardson for putting
him through this discussion. Chairman Eardley stated for
the record that Dr. Richardson is experienced with working
with a multi-institutional system that includes Universi-
ties and Community Colleges. It is difficult to find an in-
dividual who has this experience. He stated that he hoped
Dr. Richardson would consider continuing his employment
for UCCSN and consider applying for the permanent position
of Chancellor.
Mrs. Whitley stated that her greatest concern with this
situation is that she has been an advocate for diversity and
Affirmative Action. She did not want to send a message to
the institutions that the Board is not concerned with those
issues. However, in spite of those issues, the Board always
looks for the best qualified candidate, no matter what the
ethnic or gender of that individual. She stated that Dr.
Richardson is one of the best individuals this Board could
have in this position. The Board has always wanted a strong
individual in this position and it has it in Dr. Richardson.
She stated that she was supportive of the initial motion to
appoint Dr. Richardson to the position of Chancellor.
32. Information Only: Recommendations for Promotion or Assign-
ment to Rank
The following recommendations for promotion or assignment to
rank have been forwarded for Board consideration. This is
an information item only, with Board action scheduled for
the March 31-April 1, 1994 meeting.
A. University of Nevada, Reno - President Crowley recom-
mends the following promotions, effective July 1, 1994:
*Ellen J. Baker to Associate Professor in Biology,
College of Arts and Science
Bruce Bannister to Associate Professor in Family and
Community Medicine, School of Medicine
*Rafik Beekun to Associate Professor in Managerial
Sciences, College of Business Administration
Cynthia Birk to Rank 0 Associate Professor in
Accounting/CIS, College of Business Administration
*Daniel C. Bowman to Associate Professor in Biochemistry,
College of Agriculture
Cynthia M. Brown to Rank 0 Associate Professor in
Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine
James Carr to Professor in Geological Sciences, Mackay
School of Mines
*Grant R. Cramer to Associate Professor in Biochemistry,
College of Agriculture
Rhoda Cummings to Professor in Curriculum and
Instruction, College of Education
Dana Edbert to Rank 0 Assistant Professor in
Accounting/CIS, College of Business Administration
*George Fernandez to Associate Professor in Agricultural
Economics, College of Agriculture
Gary Fisher to Professor in Counseling and Educational
Psychology, College of Education
*Victoria Follette to Associate Professor in Psychology,
College of Arts and Science
*William Follette to Associate Professor in Psychology,
College of Arts and Science
Peter Goin to Professor in Art, College of Arts and
Science
*Dale W. Holcombe to Associate Professor in Veterinary
Medicine, College of Agriculture
*Burton Horowitz to Associate Professor in Physiology,
School of Medicine
Janita A. Jobe to Rank III, University Library
Gary E. Johnson to Rank 0 Associate Professor in Family
and Community Medicine, School of Medicine
Andrea Lenz to Rank 0 Associate Professor in Music,
College of Arts and Science
Emmanuel Maragakis to Professor in Civil Engineering,
College of Engineering
*Colleen A. Morris to Associate Professor in Pediatrics,
School of Medicine
Kambiz Raffiee to Professor in Economics, College of
Business Administration
*Dale S. Rogers to Associate Professor in Managerial
Sciences, College of Business Administration
Martha K. Savage to Rank 0 Associate Professor in
Seismological Laboratory, Mackay School of Mines
Marilyn Smith to Professor, Cooperative Extension
Barbara Thornton to Professor of Health Sciences,
College of Human and Community Sciences
Andrzej Trzynadlowski to Professor in Electrical
Engineering, College of Engineering
*Ann A. Tyler to Associate Professor in Speech Pathology
and Audiology, School of Medicine
*Joseba Zulaika to Associate Professor in Basque
Studies, College of Arts and Science
B. University of Nevada, Las Vegas - President Maxson
recommends the following promotions, effective July 1,
1994:
*Diane Barone to Associate Professor, ICS, College of
Education
*Richard Beckman to Associate Professor, Architecture,
College of Engineering
*Randall Boone to Associate Professor, ICS, College of
Education
Felicia Campbell to Professor, English, Liberal Arts
Stephen Caplan to Associate Professor, Music, Fine &
Performing Arts
*Carole Case to Associate Professor, Criminal Justice,
Liberal Arts
*Changfeng Chen to Associate Professor, Physics, Science
& Mathematics
*John Crank to Associate Professor, Criminal Justice,
Liberal Arts
*Evelyn Gajowski to Associate Professor, English,
Liberal Arts
*Laxmi Gewali to Associate Professor, Computer Science,
College of Engineering
*Amanda Higgins to Associate Professor, Special
Education, College of Education
*William Jankowiak to Associate Professor, Anthropology,
Liberal Arts
*Brian Johnson to Associate Professor, Chemistry,
Science & Mathematics
*Jeffrey Kottler to Professor, Counseling & Ed. Psych.,
College of Education
Myoung-ja Kwon to Rank IV, Library
*Victor Kwong to Professor, Physics, Science &
Mathematics
*Shahram Latifi to Associate Professor, Electrical &
Computer Engineering, College of Engineering
*Kia Makki to Associate Professor, Computer Science,
College of Engineering
*Susan Miller to Associate Professor, Special Education,
College of Education
William Newman to Professor, Management, Business &
Economics
*Filiz Ozel to Associate Professor, Architecture,
College of Engineering
James Pink to Professor, Art, Fine & Performing Arts
*Wesley Roehl to Associate Professor, Tourism/Convention,
Hotel Administration
Laverna Saunders to Rank IV, Technical Services,
Library
R. Keith Schwer to Professor, Economics, Business &
Economics
*R. Venkatasubramanian to Associate Professor, Electrical
& Computer Engineering, College of Engineering
*Elspeth Whitney to Associate Professor, History,
Liberal Arts
*Woosoon Yim to Associate Professor, Mechanical, College
of Engineering
*Bernard Zygelman to Associate Professor, Physics,
Science & Mathematics
C. Desert Research Institute - President Taranik recommends
the following promotion, effective July 1, 1994:
Nicholas Lancaster to Rank IV, Quaternary Sciences
Center
*Also recommended for Award to Tenure
33. Information Only: Recommendations for Award to Tenure
The following recommendations for tenure have been forwarded
for Board consideration. This is an information item only,
with Board action scheduled for the March 31-April 1, 1994
meeting.
Note: The titles stated in this agenda item are descriptive
only. Faculty are tenured in institutions, and not in
particular employment positions.
A. University of Nevada, Reno - President Crowley recom-
mends award of tenure, effective July 1, 1994, to the
following:
*Ellen J. Baker, Biology, College of Arts & Science
*Rafik Beekun, Managerial Sciences, College of Business
Administration
*Daniel C. Bowman, Biochemistry, College of Agriculture
Stephen B. Castor, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology,
Mackay School of Mines
*Grant R. Cramer, Biochemistry, College of Agriculture
George Danko, Mining Engineering, Mackay School of Mines
*George Fernandez, Agricultural Economics, College of
Agriculture
*Victoria Follette, Psychology, College of Arts and
Science
*William Follette, Psychology, College of Arts and
Science
Cheryl Glotfelty, English, Arts and Science
*Dale W. Holcombe, Veterinary Medicine, College of
Agriculture
*Burton Horowitz, Physiology, School of Medicine
John N. Louie, Seismology/Geological Sciences, Mackay
School of Mines
Rosalie Marinelli, Health Sciences, College of Human
and Community Sciences
*Colleen A. Morris, Pediatrics, School of Medicine
*Dale S. Rogers, Managerial Sciences, College of
Business Administration
Edwin G. Smith, Nevada Cooperative Extension
*Ann A. Tyler, Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of
Medicine
John J. Warwick, Environmental and Resource Sciences,
College of Agriculture
Lee A. Weber, Biology, Arts and Science
*Joseba Zulaika, Basque Studies, College of Arts and
Science
B. University of Nevada, Las Vegas - President Maxson
recommends award to tenure, effective July 1, 1994,
to the following:
Robert Aalberts, Finance, Business & Economics
*Diane Barone, ICS, College of Education
*Richard Beckman, Architecture, College of Engineering
*Randall Boone, ICS, College of Education
Mark Burns, Art, Fine & Performing Arts
*Carole Case, Criminal Justice, Liberal Arts
*Changfeng Chen, Physics, Science & Mathematics
*John Crank, Criminal Justice, Liberal Arts
Jeffrey Fiala, Theatre Art, Fine & Performing Arts
*Evelyn Gajowski, English, Liberal Arts
*Laxmi Gewali, Computer Science, College of Engineering
*Amanda Higgins, Special Education, College of Education
*William Jankowiak, Anthropology, Liberal Arts
*Brian Johnson, Chemistry, Science & Mathematics
Moses Karakorizian, Civil & Environmental, College of
Engineering
Gerald Kops, Education Admin. & Higher Education,
College of Education
*Jeffrey Kottler, Counseling & Ed. Psych., College of
Education
*Victor Kwong, Physics, Science & Mathematics
*Shahram Latifi, Electrical & Computer Engineering,
College of Engineering
Attila Lawrence, Architecture, College of Engineering
*Kia Makki, Computer Science, College of Engineering
*Susan Miller, Special Education, College of Education
Robert Molzon, Mathematics, Science & Mathematics
*Filiz Ozel, Architecture, College of Engineering
Katherine Rankin, Catalog, Library
*Wesley Roehl, Tourism/Convention, Hotel Administration
Hal Rothman, History, Liberal Arts
Douglas Unger, English, Liberal Arts
*R. Venkatasubramanian, Electrical & Computer
Engineering, College of Engineering
Walter Vodrazka, Civil & Environmental Engineering,
College of Engineering
*Elspeth Whitney, History, Liberal Arts
*Woosoon Yim, Mechanical, College of Engineering
*Bernard Zygelman, Physics, Science & Mathematics
C. Community College of Southern Nevada - President
Meacham recommends award to tenure, effective July 1,
1994, to the following:
Ann Adams, Arts & Sciences
Susan Blizard, Arts & Sciences
John Esperian, Arts & Sciences
Carmen Forner, Arts & Sciences
Angela La Sala, Arts & Sciences
Gale Martin, Arts & Sciences
Charles Okeke, Arts & Sciences
Curtis Pantle, Arts & Sciences
Joe Delrosaria, Business & Industry
Ruell Fiant, Business & Industry
Larry Martin, Business & Industry
Alfred Zavodny, Business & Industry
Michael Mc Millian, Math, Health & Human Services
Howard Tomme, Math, Health & Human Services
Hyla Winters, Math, Health & Human Services
Clarissa Erwin, Academic Support
Carol Cravens, Student Services
D. Northern Nevada Community College - President Remington
recommends award to tenure, effective July 1, 1994, to
the following:
Ed Martin, Occupational Education
Ralph Siler, Occupational/Music Education
John S. H. Smith, Humanities & Social Science
Glen Tenney, Math, Science, Computing, Business
E. Truckee Meadows Community College - President Gwaltney
recommends award to tenure, effective July 1, 1994, to
the following:
William Doherty, Professional Business Studies
Harry Ednie, Learning Resource Center
Steven Streeper, Social Science
Jonathan Young, Applied Industrial Technology
F. Western Nevada Community College - President Calabro
recommends award to tenure, effective July 1, 1994,
to the following:
Robert Collier, Academic Affairs, Science
Christine Dakin, Academic Affairs/Fallon, Academic
Skills
Kerry Deal, Academic Affairs/Fallon, Business
Christine Fregulia, Academic Affairs, Allied Health
Timothy Haller, Academic Affairs, Social Science
Renee Magrini, Academic Affairs, Science
*Also recommended for Promotion or Assignment to Rank
34. Approved Regents' Liaison to Economic Development Commission
Governor Miller on February 10, 1994 suggested that the
Board of Regents develop a liaison with the Economic Devel-
opment Commission for the purpose of being more quickly
responsive to industry requests for special training to
develop new skills to entice industry to locate to Nevada.
Mrs. Berkley moved approval of the establishment of a
Regents' Liaison to Economic Development Commission, with
the Chairman of the Board making the appointment. Dr. Derby
seconded. Motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 1:20 P.M.
Mary Lou Moser
Secretary of the Board
02-17-1994