|
Response to CCSN Budget Story
April 4, 2002
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Suzanne Ernst (702) 889-8426
Response
to CCSN Budget Story
LAS VEGAS-Chancellor Jane
Nichols today issued a response to a recent newspaper article that reported
the Community College of Southern Nevada was shortchanged $7.6 million in 2001
due to a mistake in state funding.
"The media account
of this issue contained several factual errors that must be addressed,"
said Nichols.
Nichols stated that the
$7.6 million quoted in the story is an estimate of the size of the error based
upon the current proposed classification system, not the classification system
that was in place during the 2001 legislative session. More importantly, the
figure of $7.6 million was for the two-year period of the biennium, not the
one year as reported in the media.
Nichols added that the legislature
funded the University and Community College System of Nevada at 81 percent during
the 2001-2003 biennium. The figure of $7.6 million was calculated on the assumption
that the legislature would fund the UCCSN at 100 percent.
Another factual error in
the story was that the budgeting oversight was discovered while the 2001 legislature
was in session.
"This error only came
to light in recent months and could not have been corrected by the legislature,"
said Nichols. "The UCCSN formed a study committee last November to begin
work on developing a new classification system that all institutions would approve.
During this work, we discovered that CCSN had improperly assigned certain courses
in the current budget to lower cost classifications than warranted."
"The current study
committee has taken the CCSN error into consideration and will ask the legislature
to make a technical adjustment during the next budget cycle," added Nichols.
BACKGROUND
The budget for the UCCSN for the 2001-2003 biennium was developed using a new
funding formula approved by a legislative study committee following the 1999
legislative session. The purpose of the new formula was to ensure equitable
treatment of the various UCCSN institutions and to better address rapid growth.
The new formula depends on the assignment of enrollment into different cost
classifications, which are determined by the type of courses taken by the students
in the last three years.
During the 2001 legislative
session concerns within UCCSN arose as to whether the university and community
colleges had classified similar courses in the same manner. A UCCSN committee
was formed to formulate a common classification system. Initial work by the
committee resulted in excessive additional formula costs and was deemed too
expensive to implement. In addition, numerous questions still existed concerning
the equity of this version of the classification system and the legislative
session was rapidly coming to a close. In order to stimulate a resolution to
this issue, the UCCSN asked for and received a letter of intent from the legislature
to study the problem before the next session and bring forward any recommendations
at that time. The UCCSN then formed a study committee, which began its work
last fall.
***
The Nevada Board of Regents
is the elected, 11-member governing body for the University and Community College
System of Nevada. Comprising two doctoral granting universities, a state college,
four comprehensive community colleges and one internationally acclaimed research
institute, the UCCSN serves the educational and job training needs of the nation's
fastest growing state. As Nevada's only system of higher education, the UCCSN
provides educational opportunities to nearly 100,000 students.
-30-
|