|
Meeting Highlights
October 14-15, 2004
CHAIR’S REPORT
Board Chair Stavros Anthony thanked President John Lilley and his staff for
hosting the October meeting of the Board of Regents.
CONSENT AGENDA
After discussing Consent Agenda items 2-4 and a concern by some Regents about
approving faculty tenure three months after it has been awarded by the campus,
the Board approved the following items as presented:
MINUTES
1. MINUTES
Approved minutes from the special meeting held June 28, 2004, and the regular
meeting held August 19-20, 2004.
TENURE UPON HIRE
2. TENURE UPON HIRE, UNLV: Approved a request by President Carol Harter for
the formal approval of tenure with hire for Dr. Jesus Garcia, effective August
1, 2004. Dr. Garcia accepted UNLV’s offer as Full Professor with tenure
in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction within the College of
Education. Additionally, the tenured faculty in the Department of Curriculum
and Instruction unanimously support Dr. Garcia’s tenure with hire. Of
course, his offer letter stipulated that his hire with tenure was pending
formal approval by the Board of Regents.
3. TENURE UPON HIRE, UNLV: Approved a request by President Harter for the
formal approval of tenure with hire for Dr. Edith A. Rusch, effective August 1,
2004. Dr. Rusch accepted UNLV’s offer as Associate Professor with tenure
in the Department of Educational Leadership within the College of Education.
Additionally, the tenured faculty in the Department of Educational Leadership
enthusiastically supports Dr. Rusch’s tenure with hire. Of course, her
offer letter stipulated that her hire with tenure was pending formal approval
by the Board of Regents.
4. TENURE UPON HIRE, UNLV: Approved a request by President Harter for the
formal approval of tenure with hire for Dr. Mary Elizabeth Spalding, effective
August 1, 2004. Dr. Spalding accepted UNLV’s offer as Associate Professor
with tenure in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction within the College
of Education. Additionally, the tenured faculty in the Department of
Curriculum and Instruction enthusiastically support Dr. Spalding’s tenure
with hire. Of course, her offer letter stipulated that her hire with tenure
was pending formal approval by the Board of Regents.
REHIRE OF PERS RETIREES
5. REHIRE OF PERS RETIREE, TMCC
Approved a request by President Philip Ringle to rehire a PERS retiree, Ms.
Cynthia Tedford, due to a critical labor shortage. Such hires are permitted,
with Board approval, under legislation passed during the 2001 Legislature.
HANDBOOK REVISIONS
6. HANDBOOK REVISION, ORGANIZATION OF UNLV: Approved a request by UNLV’s
president, executive vice president, and provost to update the Board of Regents
Handbook (Title V, Chapter 6, Chapter I, Sections 2.3.3 and 3) to reflect
UNLV’s current campus organization. As noted in Section 2.3.3, these
changes are not considered amendments to the Handbook, but do require
ratification by the Board of Regents.
7. HANDBOOK REVISION, GSA CONSTITUTION, UNR: Approved a request by President
John Lilley to approve amendments to the Graduate Student Association of the
University of Nevada, Reno constitution (Title V, Chapter 18) to update and
revise as a result of a recent audit.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEES
8. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEE, NSC: Approved a request by Interim President Pat
Miltenberger to approve (1) a previously approved request to use capital
improvement fees to purchase one modular building adding 1,400 sq. ft. to the
campus; and (2) to use capital improvement fees and other available resources
to add 2-3 additional modular spaces for classrooms and support spaces as funds
become available. The first project is a substitution from the June Board
meeting. NSC anticipates an additional financial impact of approximately
$30,000. The second project consists of site work, potential purchase of used
modulars, and architectural fees estimated at $200,000.
PRINCIPLES AND TARGETS FOR NEW UCCSN MASTER PLAN GOALS
Tyler Trevor, associate vice chancellor for academic affairs, presented the
Board with principles and targets for two new Master Plan goals that were
recently approved by the Regents.
For the goal of a Student-Focused System, the Board approved the following:
·
PRINCIPLE: Nevada students should see a clear path to their educational goals
through the institutions of public higher education.
·
PRINCIPLE: All students should be welcomed and individually assisted to plan
their educational goals and to reach their aspirations.
·
PRINCIPLE: It is vital that students feel a high level of satisfaction with all
elements of their higher education experience.
·
TARGET: Increase the percentage of Nevada’s general population who
participate in some form of higher education, whether through coursework,
workforce training, certificate programs, lifelong learning, or degree
programs.
·
TARGET: Strive to continually increase the percentage of students that express
a high level of satisfaction with teaching, advising, and overall educational
experiences at UCCSN institutions.
·
TARGET: Work to increase the persistence rates of first-time students that
return to UCCSN institutions with each advancing semester.
·
TARGET: Increase opportunities for students to co-enroll and transfer to
institutions throughout the state of Nevada.
For the goal of a Reputation for Excellence, the Board approved the following:
·
PRINCIPLE: Excellence in all we do is a guiding principle in the planning,
development, and implementation of academic programs, research and scholarly
activity, and contributions made to the state through public service.
·
TARGET: Continue to develop and maintain programs, centers, and institutes that
elicit national, regional, or statewide recognition for excellence.
·
TARGET: Increase the number of degree and certificate programs that receive
national, regional, or statewide accreditation.
·
TARGET: Continue to expand opportunities for UCCSN faculty to engage in
innovative teaching and research.
·
TARGET: Contribute to Nevada’s quality of life and the efficiency and
productivity of the state’s enterprises through public service rendered by
Nevada’s faculty, staff, and students.
SUPPLEMENTAL PRESIDENTIAL COMPENSATION, UNLV
The Board approved a request by the UNLV Foundation to provide supplemental
compensation to President Carol Harter. As part of the proposal, the UNLV
Foundation would provide $90,000 each year to the Board of Regents to
supplement President Harter’s compensation. Of that $90,000, $50,000 would
be given as current compensation and the remaining $40,000 would be provided
as deferred compensation and would be available to President Harter upon
retirement. An additional incentive payment would be conditioned upon the
foundation completing its successful capital campaign. This amount will be at
the discretion of the foundation, but could be up to $250,000. All payments
made by the foundation to Harter would be through the Board of Regents.
Included with the compensation plan was a modification to President
Harter’s contract that place performance requirements as well as other
contract terms.
Ted Quirk, treasurer of the UNLV Foundation, reported that the university is in
a quiet phase of a major capital campaign that will be under the leadership of
President Harter. The foundation’s goal is to raise $400-500 million.
Quirk stated that Harter is the face of the university and she has been a
proven fundraiser at UNLV over the past nine years. One of the keys in a
successful capital campaign is to not change presidents mid-stream. Quirk added
that Harter is underpaid compared to her peers and she may be underpaid by as
much as $100,000 per year. If approved, the foundation’s compensation
proposal would put her at the mid-point of her peers as well as set a precedent
for a suitable salary for her successor.
Chancellor Rogers talked about his experience working on four capital campaigns
and what it takes to run a successful campaign. He said it was essential to
keep Dr. Harter at UNLV during a capital campaign. If he were to compare her
job and responsibilities to the private sector, she should be making
approximately $500,000. He suggested that if the Board did not approve this
request, the UCCSN wouldn’t be able to compete with other systems.
Regents then discussed the option of separating the compensation proposal from
the performance contract and expressed their concern about approving an
incomplete contract. The Regents also discussed the potential of setting a
precedent for other UCCSN presidents and their respective campus foundations,
as well as the impact this decision would have on the Board’s policy of
requiring the chancellor to be the highest paid executive in the System.
Mary-Ellen McMullen, chair of the University of Nevada, Reno Foundation asked
the Board to delay voting on this item so other foundations could look at the
matter more closely. She stated she was concerned that one foundation would
have the ability to dictate demands that would impact other foundations.
HANDBOOK REVISIONS
HANDBOOK REVISION, EXECUTIVE EVALUATION PROCEDURES
The Board did not approve a request by Assistant Chancellor Trudy Larson to
modify current executive evaluation procedures to the Board Bylaws (Title I,
Article VII, Sections 3 and 4) so that an external consultant would conduct the
mandated periodic reviews. This item was presented for information and
discussion at the August 2004 Board meeting.
The Board expressed concerns that the use of only an external evaluator would
further erode the Board’s role in evaluating presidents and the
chancellor.
HANDBOOK REVISION, UCCSN CODE, DEFINITION OF SERVICE
The Board approved a request by Assistant Chancellor Larson to amend the UCCSN
Code (Title II, Chapter 3, Section 3.4.2 (3)(E), Chapter 4, Section 4.4.2
(2)(F), and Chapter 7, Section 7.4.2 (3)(F)). These amendments were originally
proposed by the ad hoc Faculty Workload Task Force and revise the definition of
service in the chapters that address faculty tenure at the universities,
community colleges, and state college.
HANDBOOK REVISION, NOTICE OF NON-REAPPOINTMENT FOR NON-TENURED ADMINISTRATIVE
FACULTY, EXCEPT DRI
The Board heard the first reading of a request from Assistant Chancellor Larson
to amend the UCCSN Code, (Title II, Chapter 5, Section 5.9) in regard to the
termination of administrative faculty. Final action on this revision is
scheduled for the December 2004 meeting.
The revision would apply to non-tenured administrative faculty hired on or
after January 1, 2005 and would shorten the period of time between notification
and termination of these faculty. Dr. Larson stated that the System’s
faculty senate chairs had considerable input on this item and that the
presidents supported the policy change. She reported that many administrative
staff, however, felt like the rug was being pulled out from under them since
don’t have similar protections as classified staff and tenured faculty.
Interim Chancellor Rogers stated that private industry has expressed their
concern to him over this issue of “feeding the dead horse.”
The revision would set termination dates at 60 days if a notice of
non-reappointment was received in the first or partial fiscal year of
employment; at 90 days if in the second fiscal year of employment; and at 120
days if in the third or subsequent fiscal year of employment.
HANDBOOK REVISION, VICE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION
The Board approved a request by Assistant Chancellor Larson to change Title IV,
Chapter 3, Section 27 of the Handbook. This revision allows the campus
presidents to approve the transition plan for their vice presidents that
without requiring Board approval.
HANDBOOK REORGANIZATION, CHAPTERS 1-7
The Board approved a request by Assistant Chancellor Larson to reorganize
Chapters 1 through 7 of the Board of Regents Handbook. The revisions removed
certain elements from the Handbook which will be placed into a newly created
Procedures and Guidelines Manual.
This particular revision edited each chapter making clarifying corrections
where necessary and policy changes previously approved by the Board.
A similar revision of later chapters will be brought before the Board at the
December 2004 and February 2005 Board meetings.
ACTION
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REPEAL OR RESCIND PRIOR BOARD ITEM
The Board took no action on a request to rescind prior action taken by the
Board on the topic of adopting a new calendar for 2005. During their June 2004
meeting, the Board approved a meeting schedule comprised of five, one-day
meetings in 2005. At the Board’s August meeting, a request was made by
member of the Board to reconsider that decision.
The Board discussed concerns about having enough time to conduct their business
in one day, as well as concerns about Open Meeting law issues if the meeting
spilled over to two days. Members also expressed their concerns about the
reduction in meetings for 2005 and felt that there was a need for the Board to
meet more frequently to address the needs of the campuses.
After the discussion concluded, the Board decided to take no action on this
item with the understanding that they may rescind an agenda item at a later
meeting.
STRATEGIC PLAN, TMCC
The Board approved the Strategic Plan for Truckee Meadows Community College as
presented by President Philip Ringle.
Ringle reported that the strategic plan came about as a result of the
college’s continuous effort for self-improvement and the direct
involvement of the campus community. The planned called for five major planning
initiatives: an academic master plan; enrollment management plan; facilities
master plan; institutional self-study for re-accreditation; and a marketing
plan.
He then discussed the major strategic goals including achieving academic
excellence. Objectives that were described to reach that goal included the
college developing accelerated nursing program options, establishing a Center
for Teaching Excellence and a Leadership Academy, as well as a Student Academic
Progress Program to help students achieve their educational goals.
Another strategic goal is to increase diversity on the campus. Objectives to
achieve this goal include expanding outreach efforts to underrepresented
students, enhancing courses that will meet diversity requirements, and
establishing an Office of Equity and Diversity.
Ringle reported that elements of the facilities master plan will include the
implementation of a space utilization plan, a facilities workflow tracking
system, and a TMCC emergency response plan.
He stated that the college’s financial and institutional effectiveness
goals will be met by improving institutional finance management practices and
implementing a comprehensive budget development system.
Ringle also added that TMCC will develop a technology infrastructure by
acquiring higher capacity network connectivity as well as creating a Web portal
with the college’s Web site.
RESOLUTION, ESCO CONTRACT, WNCC
The Board approved a request by President Lucey for a resolution regarding the
installment contract and related documents for an energy cost-saving measure
project for Western Nevada Community College.
The main focus of the project will be installing a ballast retrofit and HVAC
upgrade that will be expected to last approximately 20 years, although the
parts are under a manufacturer’s warranty lasting between 3-5 years.
Under the contract, the UCCSN will be obligated to pay $2,453,821 over the next
15 years for the project which has a projected energy savings between
$2,570,054 and $2,898,972 during the term of the contract. Contract Terms and
Conditions: 15 years at 5.05% interest. $1,718,613 total project cost.
$116,233 guaranteed minimum estimated positive cash flow over the contract
period. $445,151 estimated maximum positive cash flow over the contract
period.
Some Regents expressed concern about guarantees or major failures with
equipment. Dane Apalategui, vice president of finance for WNCC, responded that
the project has been reviewed by the Nevada Energy Retrofit Coordinator Board
and that all parties feel confident on the durability of the materials to be
used.
CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT EXTENSION
The Board approved a request by Vice Chancellor Neel for an exception to Title
IV, Chapter 10, Section 1.8 of the Board of Regents Handbook. This extension
allows the UCCSN to extend its current contract with Wells Fargo Bank for one
additional year. Neel stated the extension will provide the System with the
opportunity to go out for bid in order to receive better services at a lower
price .
2005-07 UCCSN CIP BUDGET REVISION REQUEST, KNOWLEDGE CENTER, UNR
The Board approved a request by President Lilley to increase Knowledge Center
budget by $20 million.
Ron Zurek, vice president of finance at UNR, explained the increase was due to
hyperinflation that had affected the construction costs. He stated that the
previously approved CIP budget item of $16 million would be split with $11.2
million used to help offset the cost increase. As a result, another$11.2
million would be added to the next biennium’s CIP. To cover the gap
between the $11.2 million and the $20 million, $8.8 million would come from
fund raising and student CIP money.
Zurek stated that the risk in this solution would be the legislature not being
obligated to fund the $11.2 million in the next session. If that were to occur,
the contingency plan would be to not complete parts of the Knowledge Center.
ENROLLMENTS FOR FALL 2004 SEMESTER
The campus presidents presented the following enrollment reports to the Board:
President Carpenter stated that CCSN continues to have the greatest unmet need
and had to turn away approximately 1,000 FTE students due to a classroom
shortage. The college was particularly short in classroom space for English and
biology. He added that CCSN needs to implement a sophisticated enrollment
management system that would allow the institution to track students and their
progress.
President Ringle reported that TMCC experienced a 6 percent FTE increase over
the previous fall semester, beating the projected increase of 5 percent. He
stated that 119 more sections of for-credit classes were added. Students
attending the college were between 13 and 84 years old with the 18-24 age group
representing more than 60 percent of the student body. Nearly 85 percent of
students are Nevadans with 108 international students enrolled.
President Lucey announced that WNCC had a projected enrollment increase of
1percent, but achieved a 4.2 percent increase. She stated that the college is
now experiencing its first parking problem due to the larger number of
students. She said that WNCC is trying to recruit more students to attend the
college right after high school, and as a result, the continuation rate has
increase by 3 percent with the number of Millennium Scholars attending
increasing by 20 percent.
President Killpatrick reported that FTE enrollments decreased at GBC by 2.2
percent. Although the community college is seeing more traditional age students
attending since the dormitories have opened, the college is actively trying to
reach non-traditional students in order to increase enrollment.
Interim President Miltenberger stated that headcount enrollment at NSC stands
at 1,121, up from 541 students in the fall of 2003. She said that NSC was also
getting short on space and that she had recently approved the use of portable
classrooms in order to meet the classroom needs. She added that 71 percent of
the students identified themselves as first-generation college goers and nearly
25 percent of the students were Millennium Scholars.
President Wells that although DRI has no enrollment, it does provide a
value-add to the universities and state college by supporting 60 graduate
students. He added that DRI faculty teach all of the atmospheric sciences
courses at UNR and lead the water resources program at UNLV. DRI also provides
four faculty members to teach physical sciences at NSC.
President Lilley reported that fall enrollment at UNR reached 15,940, with 16
percent being students of color – the highest percentage in the
university’s history. He said that Latinos and Asians/Pacific Islanders
represented the largest segment of increase. He added that the enrollment
growth has placed demands on academic advising, counseling and health care
services.
President Harter said that UNLV has added more than 1,500 new students,
bringing the headcount enrollment to 27,333. She reported that the FTE
enrollment is growing faster than headcount enrollment which indicates more
students are doing full-time course loads. Headcount enrollment in the
professional schools increased by 13 percent and doctoral headcount by almost
18 percent. Minority students now represent 30 percent of the student body.
CLOSED SESSION: APPEAL OF LAWRENCE RONEY PURSUANT TO UCCSN CODE, SECTION 6.14
In compliance with NRS 241.030, a closed session was scheduled to be held for
purposes of discussion of the character, alleged misconduct, professional
competence of Mr. Lawrence Roney in connection with his appeal of his
termination by CCSN. This item was pulled from the agenda.
NEW RESEARCH FACILITY, CANCER INSTITUTE, UNR
The Board heard a presentation about the potential development of a new basic
science medical research facility on the Reno campus which involves a
partnership between the University of Nevada, Reno’s School of Medicine
and the Nevada Cancer Institute.
Dr. John McDonald, dean of the University of Nevada School of Medicine,
discussed the role of biotechnology and the value of having a shared facility
to deal with important biomedical questions. He stated that the university
would utilize indirect cost recovery from grants to offset bond payment to
construct the building. Indirect costs are currently totally committed to the
hiring of faculty and funding existing grants.
Dr. Bill Murphy stated the Nevada Cancer Institute’s mission is to promote
research and cutting edge treatments in the area of cancer. To succeed, it is
crucial to tap into the existing research infrastructure. He said that the
cancer research provides a unifying force to tie together many different
disciplines and that a partnership between UNLV, UNR and the cancer institute
will greatly benefit the state.
PLANNING FOR NEW COMPUTER MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM, UCCSN
Interim Vice Chancellor for Technology Becky Seibert briefed the Board on an
initiative under discussion with the UCCSN institutions to replace the existing
computer management information systems (SIS, Advantage II, and Human
Resources) with an integrated Enterprise Resource Planning System (ERP).
Seibert stated that growth requires tools for good information and currently,
the System does not have good information to manage UCCSN. MIS systems are
10-15 years old and each system operates in a “silo” where
information exchange between systems is labor intensive and costly. The UCCSN
is missing automation in its hiring processes, budgeting system, and student
and employee tracking systems. She added that the Nevada Legislature has also
noticed these inadequacies.
She reported that a new system could cost up to $100 million and take several
years to completely install.
System Computing Services has begun a needs assessment that involves people at
all levels on all campuses. The assessment will last through the spring and
will develop a consensus for the needs among the institutions. Seibert said
that she hopes to present a recommended hardware and software solution to the
Board in the summer of 2005.
Regent Seastrand stated the assessment should begin as soon as possible and
that a search begin for a permanent vice chancellor for technology. He
suggested the Board form a Technology Task Force made up of key people from
around the UCCSN to provide oversight on the new system. Assistant Chief
Counsel Brooke Nielsen then reminded the Board that the Chancellor is
responsible for hiring all vice chancellors on his staff.
Regent Anthony then thanked Regent Seastrand for volunteering and appointed him
chair of the task force.
Seibert mentioned that IBM Consulting Services was hired at $167,000 for an
eight-week period to conduct the Human Resources system assessment.
REPORT ON LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS (AB 203)
Regent Jill Derby presented the Board with an update on the Legislative
Committee to Evaluate Higher Education Programs. She stated that the committee
looked at issues related to continued enrollment growth, workforce needs and a
diverse economy in the area of research.
The legislative committee’s consultant reported that Nevada institutions
are generally funded at appropriate levels with the exception of CCSN. All
institutions appear to be allocating funds in appropriate ways and faculty
salaries are very competitive, especially at UNR and UNLV. The consultant also
reported that faculty is not tenured at abnormally high levels and
student/teacher ratios are relatively low.
The consultant’s report also found that students enrolling as freshman,
particularly at community colleges, have a relatively low exit rate with
credentials. The UCCSN also has efficient campuses, but operates as a high-cost
system.
Regent Derby stated that the committee adopted 24 formal recommendations and
one bill draft request that would establish an interim committee, the
Committee to Advance Higher Education in Nevada, to assist in the promulgation
of the adopted recommendations.
Some of the 23 recommendations included:
·
Limiting enrollment at the universities and creating four-year program capacity
at baccalaureate institutions.
·
Avoiding four-year programs at community colleges.
·
Developing and reaching agreements on strategic-level financing plans for
Nevada’s higher education system.
·
Having the UCCSN develop internal reallocation recommendations prior to the
2005-207 interim for further consideration, and address high priority areas
such as the health care and teaching professions.
Regents then discussed how to begin implementing the recommendations. Tyler
Trevor replied that the System has the foundation in place with the UCCSN
Master Plan which gives the guidance to create strategic plans.
The Board approved the report as presented.
PERSONNEL SESSION, CHANCELLOR JAMES E. ROGERS
Regents Marcia Bandera, Linda Howard, Tom Kirkpatrick, and Bret Whipple
requested a personnel session be held concerning Chancellor Rogers.
Chancellor Rogers reviewed his accomplishments with the Board and his focus on
developing private-public partnerships and alternative funding sources. He
reported that he has made trips to Southern California related to a major
donation for the medical school and has worked closely with UNLV and UNR to
develop a joint program.
He stated that his primary credibility was his independence, although some on
the Board had expressed concern that he was too independent. He added that he
felt he was very comfortable now in his relationship with the Regents and that
he had the feeling that private and corporate communities are more comfortable
with what is going on at the university system.
Rogers then stated that one of his greatest concerns is Nevada State College.
He said he was well aware of certain representations made to the Board in
regard to the ability of private funds being raised, but added that it is near
impossible to receive seed money for a start-up college. He would like the
legislature to put up $9 million and believes that that initial investment will
yield $200-300 million in donations for UNLV and UNR.
The Chancellor then added that most of his time would be spent raising money
for the System and he will work closer with the private sector in the months
ahead.
The Regents then discussed the current arrangements with System lobbyists where
the UCCSN paid $120,000 for two lobbyists and the Chancellor paid $120,000 out
of his own pocket for a third lobbyist. All three would represent the UCCSN.
Rogers assured the Regents that all of his private companies were federally
regulated and that he had no state legislative agenda.
Rogers encouraged the Board to extend more of its authority to the Chancellor
and stated that the System cannot survive on drop-in management by Regents. The
Board needs to convince the private sector that the UCCSN is efficient and
open.
Regent Howard Rosenberg expressed his displeasure with how the Chancellor had
sent memos critical of the Board to the media. He stated that education is
about shared governance and that the position of Chancellor is not about being
a development officer.
Other Regents commended the Chancellor for his work and said the System has
come a long way since Rogers came on board in May.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
ACADEMIC, RESEARCH & STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
Committee member Doug Seastrand presented a report on the October 14 meeting of
the Academic, Research & Student Affairs Committee.
The Board approved the following committee recommendations:
·
New Program Proposals:
o
Bachelor of Animal Biotechnology, UNR
o
Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Molecular Biosciences (MCB), Master of
Science (M.S.), Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), UNR
o
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), UNLV
o
Ph.D. Degree in the Discipline of Chemistry, UNLV
·
New Unit Proposals:
o
Latino Center (UNRLC), UNR
o
Athletic Training Research Laboratory, UNLV
o
Center for Mathematics and Science Education, UNLV
o
Handbook Revision, Developmental and Remedial Education – The Committee
recommended approval of a revision to the Board of Regents Handbook (Title IV,
Chapter 16) concerning placement into and completion of developmental/remedial
coursework.
o
Handbook Revision, Residency Requirement for Reclassification of Instate Status
– The Committee recommended approval of a revision to the
Board of Regents Handbook (Title 4, Chapter 15, Section 8)
to reduce the residency requirement for reclassification of in-state status to
6 months from 12 months and revisions to the financial independence
definition.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Committee Chair Douglas Roman Hill presented a report on the October 14 meeting
of the Audit Committee.
The Board approved the following committee recommendations:
·
Internal Audit Reports:
o
Center for Academic Enrichment & Outreach, UNLV
o
Student Health Center, UNLV
o
Office of International Students & Scholars, UNLV
o
Office of International Students & Scholars, UNR
o
International Student Services, CCSN
o
UCCSN South File Server
·
Audit Department Work Plan – The Committee recommended approval of the
Internal Audit Department work plan for the year ending June 30, 2005.
·
DRI Exemption – The Committee recommended approval of an exemption for the
year ended June 30, 2004 from the audit requirements stated in Title IV,
Chapter 10, Section 10, B1 for the DRI Research Parks, Ltd. Foundation.
BUDGET & FINANCE COMMITTEE
Committee member Hill presented a report on the October 14 meeting of the
Budget & Finance Committee.
The Board approved the following committee recommendations:
·
Requests for information from the August 19, 2004 meeting where the committee
considered changes to the current parking policies for the campuses.
·
Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Accountability Report – Board of Regents’
Approved Budget to Actual – The Committee recommended approval of the
fiscal year-end 2003-04 Accountability Report.
·
Handbook Revision, Special Course Fees, UNR – The Committee recommended
approval of amending the “pass-through” special course fee for Alpine
Skiing (Title IV, Chapter 17, Section 19). The fee was modified on August 20,
2004 by Diamond Peak Ski Resort. The Board approved amendments to the special
course fees in March 2004.
NSC PRESIDENTIAL SEARCH COMMITTEE
Committee member Jack Lund Schofield presented a report on the August 24
meeting of the ad hoc NSC Presidential Search Committee.
The Board approved the following committee recommendations:
·
Presidential Leadership Statement and Related Materials – The committees
and the consultant recommended approval of the proposed leadership profile,
advertisement, and other related materials for the NSC presidential search.
·
Advertising Options – The committees and the consultant recommended
approval of which publications to place the NSC presidential advertisement.
·
Search Process and Calendar – The committees recommended approval of the
meeting calendar.
BOARD DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Committee Chair Thalia Dondero presented a report on October 9 meeting of the
Board Development Committee.
The Board approved the following committee recommendations:
·
New Regent Orientation – The Committee recommended approval of a date and
agenda for an orientation meeting for newly elected Regents.
·
The Committee recommended approval of ideas for an ethics workshop.
·
Defining Chancellor/Board Relationship – The Committee recommended
approval of the role of the chancellor in preparation for the search for that
position.
|
